More Fizz Less Pop Part 3
Had a good week off, picked my wee lad up from school every night, took him to his footie training on wednesday, swimming on monday, was at his first School dinner yesterday and took him to MacDonalds for lunch today.
Don't know about him but I'm tired out.
Been eating far too much this week as well, today it was coco pops and toast for breakfast, big mac and chips for lunch, chicken and ham pie followed by plum tart and ice cream for tea.
I need to get back to work before I'm to fat to leave the house !!!!!!!!!!!!
Don't know about him but I'm tired out.
Been eating far too much this week as well, today it was coco pops and toast for breakfast, big mac and chips for lunch, chicken and ham pie followed by plum tart and ice cream for tea.
I need to get back to work before I'm to fat to leave the house !!!!!!!!!!!!
Scotlands got new licensing laws starting tuesday.
No more happy hours or drink promotions in pubs.
Alcohol can only be bought between 10 and 10 on weekdays and 12.30 to 10 on sundays from shops.
Couple of years ago I'd have been devestated.
No more happy hours or drink promotions in pubs.
Alcohol can only be bought between 10 and 10 on weekdays and 12.30 to 10 on sundays from shops.
Couple of years ago I'd have been devestated.
yep, the John Hannah ones are the best, Ken Stott's ok too but the ones Hannah are in stay quite true to the books.
Some of the Ken Stott ones are based so loosly on the books they often barely resemble the same story.
In " The Falls " for example, the murderer in the book is actually the first victim in the film, it then goes on to just make it all up.
Some of the Ken Stott ones are based so loosly on the books they often barely resemble the same story.
In " The Falls " for example, the murderer in the book is actually the first victim in the film, it then goes on to just make it all up.
Ken Stott makes a believable Rebus, John Hannah is good but is a wee bit too young in them.
The problem with the Ken Stott ones though is the fact they drift so far away from the books.
The John Hannah ones are recogniseable as the books they are supposed to be whereas the Stott ones are decent films but you couldn't necessarily pick which book it was supposed to be if you didn't know the title.
"The naming of the dead " for example was set round the world trade summit at Gleneagles Hotel in 2005.
Neither the hotel or the summit are even mentioned in the film !!!!!!!!!!!
The problem with the Ken Stott ones though is the fact they drift so far away from the books.
The John Hannah ones are recogniseable as the books they are supposed to be whereas the Stott ones are decent films but you couldn't necessarily pick which book it was supposed to be if you didn't know the title.
"The naming of the dead " for example was set round the world trade summit at Gleneagles Hotel in 2005.
Neither the hotel or the summit are even mentioned in the film !!!!!!!!!!!
Currently Active Users Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)