View Poll Results: Is it better to quit 'just for today' or once and forever?
It is better to quit just for today.
23
43.40%
It is better to quit once and forever.
30
56.60%
Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll
Quitting 'just for today' vs. Quitting forever?
Firstly, Rational Recovery has no members. Secondly, RR's advice on ultimatums is for families who are at their wits end, not for the neighbor. I once asked Trimpey what he would recommend for a friend whose son was practically bankrupting them with rehab stints, and if RR's multimedia materials would help and be worth buying in that case. He told me flat out that if the family is willing to put up with repeated relapses, that there was little that I, or RR, could do. He suggested I ask my friend how long he was willing to put up with his son's behavior, and to go from there.
So there, I’ve raised your “countless’ with a capitalized “countless”.
This is common sense. Although the words are identical, the breadth and depth of me saying “I decide to not drink today” at three DAYS sober is incomparable to when I say it at 3 YEARS sober.
Indeed, where you appear stuck in the mud is in extrapolating Week 1 mentality to Week 1000. This assumption of stagnation sells the addict short by assuming s/he is incapable of personal growth, which is quite unexpected from someone who claims to be a champion of the unknowingly capable addict.
And while we’re at it, let me highlight again we’re in the NEWCOMERS section. For many addicts—perhaps lower-case “countless”—ODAAT provides the initial space required to start (re)building. During the rebuilding process, ODAAT might or might not play an ongoing role. Certainly it is often quoted in the “rooms”. But, how many more folks use AA as a launching pad to sobriety rather than becoming “lifers”? Dare I say capitalized, bold-font COUNTLESS?
I'm not suggesting that you haven't already been following thru.
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: « USA » Recovered with AVRT (Rational Recovery) ___________
Posts: 3,680
Indeed, where you appear stuck in the mud is in extrapolating Week 1 mentality to Week 1000. This assumption of stagnation sells the addict short by assuming s/he is incapable of personal growth, which is quite unexpected from someone who claims to be a champion of the unknowingly capable addict.
I'm quite mindful that the first few months might be 'white knuckling', and I can see the short-term thing working at first, while you get your legs under you, so to speak...
I suppose another good question would be, where is the cut-off for making up your mind? One year? Five years? Ten years? Never?
I suppose another good question would be, where is the cut-off for making up your mind? One year? Five years? Ten years? Never?
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,146
langkah: Should they have a neighbor who drinks a lot, for example. He believes in getting right in the drinker's face and telling them they better stop for good, or else.
TU: Firstly, Rational Recovery has no members. Secondly, RR's advice on ultimatums is for families who are at their wits end, not for the neighbor.
Trimpey: If my neighbor drinks, that’s his business. If he hurts people when he drinks, that’s everybody’s business, my business, your business. The sharpest, most effective intervention for that person is a confrontation, “Hey, buddy, I know what you’re doing and your drinking makes you dangerous. You know right from wrong, so knock off the drinking, for good!” No paper slippers, no recovery groups, no one-day-at-a-time sobriety, no sponsors. Just knock it off, or else.
Trimpey: The Rational Recovery Monitor Program (RRMP) is part of the membership area of the RR website.
I guess that's part of the membership area where members could go if RR had members. Since they don't you say, Trimpey should really then delete that entirely, or possibly use that space as a shrine venerating the wisdom of Ann Coulter.
TU: Firstly, Rational Recovery has no members. Secondly, RR's advice on ultimatums is for families who are at their wits end, not for the neighbor.
Trimpey: If my neighbor drinks, that’s his business. If he hurts people when he drinks, that’s everybody’s business, my business, your business. The sharpest, most effective intervention for that person is a confrontation, “Hey, buddy, I know what you’re doing and your drinking makes you dangerous. You know right from wrong, so knock off the drinking, for good!” No paper slippers, no recovery groups, no one-day-at-a-time sobriety, no sponsors. Just knock it off, or else.
Trimpey: The Rational Recovery Monitor Program (RRMP) is part of the membership area of the RR website.
I guess that's part of the membership area where members could go if RR had members. Since they don't you say, Trimpey should really then delete that entirely, or possibly use that space as a shrine venerating the wisdom of Ann Coulter.
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: « USA » Recovered with AVRT (Rational Recovery) ___________
Posts: 3,680
The RRMP is for people mandated to AA/NA by the courts or as part of a diversion program. Some people manage to convince the judge to accept it as an alternative.
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: « USA » Recovered with AVRT (Rational Recovery) ___________
Posts: 3,680
Langkah, you won't easily suck me into an irrelevant discussion on Jack Trimpey's political or religious beliefs. I don't actually care too much what the man thinks about any of that stuff. Besides, I know your MO from your many attempts to stir things up on other non-AA forums, remember?
I think we've had a good run but the theme keeps coming back to other peoples experiences & a little bit of axe grinding so I think we'll leave it there.
Hopefully those newcomers who've read the thread got something out of it
D
Hopefully those newcomers who've read the thread got something out of it
D
Currently Active Users Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)