Recovering vs. Recovered

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-14-2009, 02:53 PM
  # 21 (permalink)  
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southern Colorado
Posts: 1,167
Recovered is better. Recovered > Recovering

I took the treatment out of the Big Book and it worked.

Recovered does not mean cured.

What's the issue here?

Read the title page of the BB and go with that. Don't take my word for it.

Buy your own Big Book, read your own Big Book. That way, we have no argument. Unless... of course... you want to argue.
McGowdog is offline  
Old 04-14-2009, 05:05 PM
  # 22 (permalink)  
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 1,636
Several months ago, I was over at my not-a-sponsors* house for a chick-flick night with several other program women. Of course, at some point, we just had to take a break from the flicks and talk recovery / spiritual journey stuff. And it was a really great, deep-working discussion with people sharing important stuff, and at one point, my not-a-sponsor goes: "Oh my god, can you believe it! I've been working on this stuff for 28 years. Don't you think I'd have it all figured out by now????"

And we all laughed. But then I said, "Well, what else could we be doing that would be more important and more fun than this? I mean, really, what could be more fun and exciting than doing this kind of work?"

And she said: "Yeah, that's probably right....Most people would be using the movies as a break......but here we are taking a break from the movies to do do the work!!!!"

So, yeah, I do believe that I'm a lifer...and it's recovering for me!

freya


* She's my not-a-sponsor because, although she is in actual practice my sponsor, since she's AA and I'm Al Anon, we jokingly call her my not-a-sponsor.
freya is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 06:55 AM
  # 23 (permalink)  
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pugetopolis
Posts: 2,384
I'm recovered from alcoholism. Doesn't mean that I'm different, special, better, or have been raised to some exalted status. It merely means that I don't suffer from alcoholism anymore.

To be recovering means to still be suffering. I was recovering one time when I was in between Steps 3-11 during my first year. Before that I was neither recovered nor recovering. I don't want to be always recovering. It baffles me why someone years away from a drink would want to still be sick when I've seen guys I sponsor recover at three months or less of sobriety.

Seems the debate is usually started by folks who are neither. Most that say they are recovering aren't.
jimhere is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 07:41 AM
  # 24 (permalink)  
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southern Colorado
Posts: 1,167
Thank you!

I still don't know why this is even an issue.

I guess I'm assuming that the people who argue this and/or debate this;

      I refuse to dummy down my program. Here's what I have to do to get recovered. By nature, I should be on a bar stool, in a jail cell, or dead. This disease kills. I'm not willing to fu#% with it. You maybe, but I'm not. If you don't have to work the Program of Alcoholics Anonymous for sobriety, I'm not interested.

      Where's the AA forum at? That's where I'll be.
      McGowdog is offline  
      Old 04-15-2009, 07:58 AM
        # 25 (permalink)  
      Living in sobriety
       
      nelco's Avatar
       
      Join Date: Feb 2009
      Posts: 3,870
      How important is this??

      Maybe its a pride thing with some people, I dont know.

      I have and continue to work through all the steps.
      I have contented soberity.
      I take my recovery one day at a time....I will know very quickly what I am if I dont !! if I pick up a drink.......debate will be over. And the drink will be at the end of the madness......
      nelco is offline  
      Old 04-15-2009, 08:23 AM
        # 26 (permalink)  
      Member
       
      Join Date: Apr 2009
      Location: Southern Colorado
      Posts: 1,167
      Originally Posted by nelco View Post
      How important is this??...
      It's life and death, actually.

      Recov....VIRDA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      If the first 100 Recovered alcoholics that wrote the Big Book wanted to say recovering, they would have said and printed recovering.

      We have a way out on which we can absolutely agree. Agreed? Or do you have some other program? If you do, please do us a favor and don't call it AA. Call it BB!

      :rotfxko

      But you'll have to name your book something else, like LB.
      McGowdog is offline  
      Old 04-15-2009, 12:18 PM
        # 27 (permalink)  
      Member
       
      Join Date: Sep 2007
      Posts: 1,876
      I agree with nelco...how important is it? Personally I consider myself free...not recovering or recovered, just free to live life as it should be. I worked hard to get here, why waste time worrying about semantics.
      bugsworth is offline  
      Old 04-15-2009, 12:56 PM
        # 28 (permalink)  
      Administrator
       
      Dee74's Avatar
       
      Join Date: Apr 2007
      Location: Australia
      Posts: 211,445
      I use the DD (Dee Does) method.
      Don't drink, help people, live right, don't get bogged down in useless semantics.

      Works great

      D
      Dee74 is offline  
      Old 04-15-2009, 02:10 PM
        # 29 (permalink)  
      Member
       
      Pinkcuda's Avatar
       
      Join Date: Sep 2007
      Location: Colorado Prairie
      Posts: 1,417
      When I seriously wanted to put drinking behind me through AA I realized I was not at liberty to pick and choose which parts of the book I believed, and which I didn't have to, which steps I felt like doing, and which principles I adhered to and which I didn't.
      I'm going to do AA my way has never done a thing for anyone. I see people bouncing in and out all the time with that attitude.
      I hear people saying A.A. didn't work for me. They did it their way. That's why.
      "Half measures availed us nothing"
      Therefore I must believe the book 100% and the book says "Recovered"
      Pinkcuda is offline  
      Old 04-15-2009, 02:57 PM
        # 30 (permalink)  
      Member
       
      Join Date: May 2004
      Location: Upstate New York
      Posts: 1,636
      Originally Posted by jimhere View Post
      Seems the debate is usually started by folks who are neither. Most that say they are recovering aren't.
      I'm not getting the need to put people down just because they ask a question the answer to which you personally find to be a no-brainer. I want to just float out there the ever-so-remote possibility that not everyone sees the world -- or reads the Big Book -- in such totally static, black and white terms, and that it just might possibly, with a huge deep breath and a tiny little opening of the mind, be OK that people are different and conceptualize their recovery work in different ways. I've read the OP several times and see absolutely no evidence that the poster isn't sincerely interested in hearing and understanding better the various ways people answer his question and the reasons why they do so. I also see no reason to assume that his interest in doing so calls into question the quality -- in fact, the very existence -- of his recovery.

      But, I do have to agree with you absolutely that, in my experience, most people who say they are recovering aren't....Unfortunately, in my experience most people who are recovering say exactly the same thing...(and, you know, for the life of me, I really sometimes cannot tell which is which -- of course, this could be because it's really none of my business to begin with!)....Now how friggin' inconvenient is that!!!...Geesh, I don't suppose that could possibly just be because the vast majority of people in my locale were "taught" to do it that way.....and that the use of "recovered" vs."recovering" just really isn't such a brilliant determiner of the quality and/or existence of people's actually recoveries?????...but then again, why would it be my -- or your or anyone else's -- business to be issuing overly generalized judgments about other people's recoveries based on this, or any other, severely limited standard to begin with?????? And, by extension, what would it say about my own recovery if I were to feel the need to be going around doing so?

      Originally Posted by McGowdog View Post
      If the first 100 Recovered alcoholics that wrote the Big Book wanted to say recovering, they would have said and printed recovering.
      Well, obviously......but, really, I seriously doubt that any of the first 100 now-probably-both-dead-and-recovered alcoholics are reading or posting on this thread. So, your point would be??????????????

      We are talking about human beings here, right? We're not talking about Gods or even gods.....or even about people who claimed to have channeled what they wrote directly from the mind of the divine. And if we are not talking about writing directly from the divine in some sense, then where oh where is the assumption of infalibility and/or of absolute finality coming from?????

      Some people actually believe that what makes great writing and thinking (of the human variety) great is the way it naturally lends itself to growth and interpretation and remains relevant in and adaptable to history's changing times and mankind's changing needs. Clearly, you are not one of those people, and that's fine -- but can you really say with absolute certainty that not a single one of those first 100 weren't?

      ....but, ooops, I forgot, you're not even participating in this thread anymore...isn't that what you said a few posts ago?

      freya
      freya is offline  
      Old 04-15-2009, 04:03 PM
        # 31 (permalink)  
      Living in sobriety
       
      nelco's Avatar
       
      Join Date: Feb 2009
      Posts: 3,870
      It's life and death, actually.
      Is this directed at me? If so I fail to see how a word is life and death!! .
      my program is the same as most A.A's I hang with,I call them winners.......

      I keep it simple..............clean house , trust God and help others

      Its been working for me for 11 years now
      nelco is offline  
      Old 04-15-2009, 10:04 PM
        # 32 (permalink)  
      Member
       
      Join Date: Apr 2009
      Location: Southern Colorado
      Posts: 1,167
      Originally Posted by freya View Post
      I'm not getting the need to put people down just because they ask a question the answer to which you personally find to be a no-brainer. I want to just float out there the ever-so-remote possibility that not everyone sees the world -- or reads the Big Book -- in such totally static, black and white terms, and that it just might possibly, with a huge deep breath and a tiny little opening of the mind, be OK that people are different and conceptualize their recovery work in different ways. I've read the OP several times and see absolutely no evidence that the poster isn't sincerely interested in hearing and understanding better the various ways people answer his question and the reasons why they do so. I also see no reason to assume that his interest in doing so calls into question the quality -- in fact, the very existence -- of his recovery.

      But, I do have to agree with you absolutely that, in my experience, most people who say they are recovering aren't....Unfortunately, in my experience most people who are recovering say exactly the same thing...(and, you know, for the life of me, I really sometimes cannot tell which is which -- of course, this could be because it's really none of my business to begin with!)....Now how friggin' inconvenient is that!!!...Geesh, I don't suppose that could possibly just be because the vast majority of people in my locale were "taught" to do it that way.....and that the use of "recovered" vs."recovering" just really isn't such a brilliant determiner of the quality and/or existence of people's actually recoveries?????...but then again, why would it be my -- or your or anyone else's -- business to be issuing overly generalized judgments about other people's recoveries based on this, or any other, severely limited standard to begin with?????? And, by extension, what would it say about my own recovery if I were to feel the need to be going around doing so?



      Well, obviously......but, really, I seriously doubt that any of the first 100 now-probably-both-dead-and-recovered alcoholics are reading or posting on this thread. So, your point would be??????????????

      We are talking about human beings here, right? We're not talking about Gods or even gods.....or even about people who claimed to have channeled what they wrote directly from the mind of the divine. And if we are not talking about writing directly from the divine in some sense, then where oh where is the assumption of infalibility and/or of absolute finality coming from?????

      Some people actually believe that what makes great writing and thinking (of the human variety) great is the way it naturally lends itself to growth and interpretation and remains relevant in and adaptable to history's changing times and mankind's changing needs. Clearly, you are not one of those people, and that's fine -- but can you really say with absolute certainty that not a single one of those first 100 weren't?

      ....but, ooops, I forgot, you're not even participating in this thread anymore...isn't that what you said a few posts ago?

      freya
      Are you judging me? How's that working?
      McGowdog is offline  
      Old 04-16-2009, 09:01 AM
        # 33 (permalink)  
      Member
       
      Join Date: May 2004
      Location: Upstate New York
      Posts: 1,636
      Originally Posted by McGowdog View Post
      Are you judging me? How's that working?
      I wouldn't know how it's working because I wasn't judging you at all....just pointing out, trying to get you to think more about, and maybe even support and develop a few of the more unclear and highly questionable implications of what you wrote. There is rather important difference. It is quite possible to hold someone accountable for his words without making judgments about him as a human being. As someome who seems to have been around more than a few 24 hours, I would think you'd be quite aware of that, so I'm kinda confused as to why you seem to be trying to pretend that they are one and the same.

      And actually, in the line quoted in my previous post, Jim expressed quite a broad judgment about a fairly large group of people, based only on the fact that they ID as "recovering" as opposed to "recovered," and, if I recall correctly, you actually gave it your stamp of approval. That leads me to believe that perhaps it's not really judgments and/or judging others that you have a problem with, but whether or not what you decide to lable a "judgment" happens to align with your personal opinions or not.

      Of course, I did make the "guess" that, despite what you'd said earlier, you were still emotionally engaged in the thread....but that's not a judgment either, just a common sense (and obviously correct) deduction based on what I've read of yours here and elsewhere.

      freya
      freya is offline  
      Old 04-16-2009, 09:15 AM
        # 34 (permalink)  
      Member
       
      Join Date: Apr 2009
      Location: Southern Colorado
      Posts: 1,167
      Are you drinking too much ... coffee... this morning?

      Shalom.

      ...recovered...
      McGowdog is offline  
      Old 04-16-2009, 09:25 AM
        # 35 (permalink)  
      Member
       
      Join Date: May 2004
      Location: Upstate New York
      Posts: 1,636
      I'm a tea drinker, actually, and only one cup this morning, as usual!

      ...but thanks for your gentlemanly concern!

      freya
      freya is offline  
      Old 04-16-2009, 09:57 AM
        # 36 (permalink)  
      Member
       
      Join Date: Apr 2009
      Location: Southern Colorado
      Posts: 1,167
      Have a nice day.

      I'm gonna go read my Big Book again.

      So now that we have the recovering/recovered debate solved... let's ponder this; "Those who do not recover are people who cannot or will not completely give themselves to this simple program..."
      BB Quote....1st. Edition

      So, what's the difference between a cannot and a will not?

      Last edited by CarolD; 04-17-2009 at 08:17 AM. Reason: Added quoted source as per SR guidelines
      McGowdog is offline  
      Old 04-16-2009, 10:38 AM
        # 37 (permalink)  
      Member
       
      Mark75's Avatar
       
      Join Date: Oct 2008
      Posts: 6,947
      OK, I had to run an errand and I thought about this, well, not the little spat .. but the issue in the OP

      If a disease goes away when consumption of whatever the causative agent was stops, than I feel that a person is recovered. If you are anemic from eating lead based paint chips and your blood count becomes normal after you stop eating lead, well... your recovered. However, you can't eat any more lead based paint chips...

      I am not drinking alcohol, for seven months. I still have the disease because I don't feel that many of those "character defects" (actually I kind of hate that term, but, there are other threads... ) that led me to alcoholism are gone. I need to keep working the steps... I am recover-ing.

      I see a time that I will be recover-ed. I don't know when that will be, I'll know it. I also know that I have to keep my treatment active to keep my disease inactive. Just like I won't eat paint.

      So, there's my 2 cents... (ducking)

      Mark

      Last edited by Mark75; 04-16-2009 at 10:40 AM. Reason: typo
      Mark75 is offline  
      Old 04-16-2009, 10:58 AM
        # 38 (permalink)  
      Member
       
      Pinkcuda's Avatar
       
      Join Date: Sep 2007
      Location: Colorado Prairie
      Posts: 1,417
      Originally Posted by McGowdog View Post
      Have a nice day.

      I'm gonna go read my Big Book again.

      So now that we have the recovering/recovered debate solved... let's ponder this; "Those who do not recover are people who cannot or will not completely give themselves to this simple program..."

      So, what's the difference between a cannot and a will not?
      The difference between "Can Not" and "Will Not" is a persons choice.
      It's the same as Can"t or Chooses not to.
      Pinkcuda is offline  
      Old 04-16-2009, 03:47 PM
        # 39 (permalink)  
      Member
       
      Join Date: Apr 2009
      Location: Southern Colorado
      Posts: 1,167
      Originally Posted by nelco View Post
      How important is this??

      Maybe its a pride thing with some people, I dont know.
      Yeah, it was directed at you, as I included your quote and your name in the response.

      It's seems like it's just words, but words and how we use them are very important. Let's take attitude for example. You say you have 11 years, hang out with winners, and stay sober one day at a time, and assume some people like to have a "pride thing."

      Well that's great. I hang out with people who say "recovered." I also hang out with new people who will learn to say "recovered" as well.

      Have a nice day.

      Originally Posted by Cubile 75
      "character defects" (actually I kind of hate that term, but, there are other threads... )
      Well that's fine. You don't have to use that word. You could say, "sin" or "wrongs" or ...

      PS: Thx 4 that Pink. I always believed the cannots were perhaps incapable of being honest with themselves and couldn't get sober based on that alone, or maybe a wet-brain or something. Funny thing about a wet-brain, (not like haha funny, like Slingblade funny), is that I've seen a couple who did stay sober... allbeit a little too late for comfort.

      But the will not is someone who just will find a way to not "jump in" or give themselves to this simple program... aka, they may not be done drinking yet. But, many who should be ready die. So I think you have to be both fortunate to wind up at a meeting with just an ounce of willingness and be very very lucky to come across some recovered alcoholics who will shoot you straight and help you see your 1st step and show you what specifically they did to work the AA program out of the book step by step, letter by letter, and word by word.

      But whatdoIknow?
      McGowdog is offline  
      Old 04-16-2009, 05:37 PM
        # 40 (permalink)  
      Member
       
      Join Date: Sep 2005
      Location: Houston, TX
      Posts: 2,126
      Originally Posted by McGowdog View Post
      Have a nice day.

      I'm gonna go read my Big Book again.

      So now that we have the recovering/recovered debate solved... let's ponder this; "Those who do not recover are people who cannot or will not completely give themselves to this simple program..."

      So, what's the difference between a cannot and a will not?
      It was suggested to me early-on in recovery that along with the BB I also have a dictionary close at hand..........

      .....so, what's the difference..between 'I cannot' and 'I will not'..? Might I suggest you check it out in that dictionary?
      NoelleR is offline  

      Currently Active Users Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
       
      Posting Rules
      You may not post new threads
      You may not post replies
      You may not post attachments
      You may not edit your posts

      BB code is On
      Smilies are On
      [IMG] code is On
      HTML code is Off
      Trackbacks are On
      Pingbacks are On
      Refbacks are Off





      All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:00 AM.