The divided self
Jeffrey has a case of the blah-blahs. As in when the words "drinking alcohol" crop up, it is blah blah this and blah blah that. Everything but quitting drinking is fair game for endless discussion. Talking about quitting drinking for good is verboten to Jeffrey, and he blows his top at any mention of it.
i didn't read the OP as having any question about AVRT, as was claimed up above.
the OP is a rather open- ended post where the poster was reminded or brought to think about some features of AVRT by reading in James' Varieties of Religious Experiences, which he found a good laugh.
(i have read that book, and found it a tough slog, myself)
i have stopped responding to threads where there is a clear question addressed to a person who is a member of a certain group., such as "question to SMART people", but this thread here seemingly invites general participation.
what saddens me about the suggestion that someone not participate in threads like this unless they have only good and encouraging things to say is that the field is getting narrower and narrower here, and suggestions that folk leave if they disagree or widen the questions will only tighten the spiral.
and that is in addition to plain nasty personal attacks.
the OP is a rather open- ended post where the poster was reminded or brought to think about some features of AVRT by reading in James' Varieties of Religious Experiences, which he found a good laugh.
(i have read that book, and found it a tough slog, myself)
i have stopped responding to threads where there is a clear question addressed to a person who is a member of a certain group., such as "question to SMART people", but this thread here seemingly invites general participation.
what saddens me about the suggestion that someone not participate in threads like this unless they have only good and encouraging things to say is that the field is getting narrower and narrower here, and suggestions that folk leave if they disagree or widen the questions will only tighten the spiral.
and that is in addition to plain nasty personal attacks.
quat
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: terra (mostly)firma
Posts: 4,823
That's where I personally part ways with RR, which is pretty early actually. Addiction is fundamentally a biochemical process, as evidenced by large piles of data for example on brain imaging, and it is caused not by character defects or beasts or pleasure drives, it is brain chemistry altered by the consumption of alcohol itself. Stop the alcohol (this is hard to do, of course), and in time your brain is normal again. This too is evidenced by large piles of data. Certainly by the end of my drinking days, I was miserable, and I didn't drink because of hedonistic pleasure, I drank because the consequences of stopping (withdrawal and having to face the wreckage around me) seemed even more horrible. I'm still puzzled by Trimpey talking about permanent features, that certainly don't exist in most people who don't drink or drink to the point of addiction.
You said that even at the end of your drinking , you drank instead of facing the consequences of not drinking. I did too, btw.
How did you quit, if not by making the decision to quit? How,did you overcome the biochemical process while in its midst?
I'd agree there are piles of scientific data, just not sold on the conclusions some make of them. I'm sure there have been drunks for as long as there has been alcohol and just as sure there were quitters among them.
Has addiction changed since the advent of fMRI?
Great question, I wish I understood. This came up in another thread, and for me I guess it came down to, I ran out of alternatives that were not worse than quitting. End of the line, on the verge of totally wrecking everything I had worked hard for, wife was about to leave again for the last time, leaving me alone to drink myself to death. I knew that was next, and I didn't want that. Somehow, with the last vestiges of will and a lot of help from my wife and counselors and support groups at an outpatient rehab, I just put on my blinders and marched through the days until, weeks later, I kinda came out of the fog. I absolutely own the process as a thinking individual with will, just like I own all that I did that led me to becoming a shaking, deceitful and denying addict, but I definitely could not have done it without a lot of help and support. That's me, other people may have different stories.
Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,654
That is factually correct, as you both well know. What I don't know, is what do you get out of constantly disparaging someone else's method of stopping drinking?
Just to quickly describe the book for those who haven't read it, James gives lots of accounts of individual spiritual experiences to support his thesis that religious understanding starts from personal experience of God, not the other way round. Organised religion of whatever variety can then hopefully play a role by providing an intellectual framework in which you can interpret your experience and take it further. He tries to see if there is any commonality in people's experiences, finds that there is and draws conclusions from this about the nature of religious truth and salvation. As I say, one big scream laugh from beginning to end
Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,654
You have already accused one free sober person with a lot of experience and wisdom of "triggering your beast" or some such thing, I don't want to trigger you but you should be aware that RR is one of many approaches to stopping drinking, it's not the only one, and they're all equally valid for different people.
Of course there are many approaches to stop drinking, that goes without saying. I simply post regarding the approach that was successful for me.
Regarding your accusation that I'm "stuck in phase- 1 of early recovery". I'm not stuck in any stage - because I'm RECOVERED! I only read and post on SR on an altruistic basis, to offer insight into my method of recovery, AVRT. I only posted on this thread because the OP (AlericB) was reading up on AVRT and we'd had previous exchanges in their previous threads.
Why did you post? To talk the OP out of AVRT, that's how it reads, I do hope that wasn't the intention. If someone had acted as you have here, on my original thread last year (as opposed to the complete support and encouragement I received) I may have been dissuaded from AVRT and I'd likely be dead now. AVRT was my last port of call. This isn't a game.
Tatsy,
I have found your posts the most helpful to me of any on this forum and I'm sure many visitors do too.
You certainly don't need to defend yourself from patently false criticisms like this. They don't sound good anyway, quite disgraceful actually.
I have found your posts the most helpful to me of any on this forum and I'm sure many visitors do too.
You certainly don't need to defend yourself from patently false criticisms like this. They don't sound good anyway, quite disgraceful actually.
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,109
Tatsy, when I came back to SR and made my final BP you were incredibly supportive to me! Your help and the inspiration of your success helped me to see that I could do this. And you're right if one of us went into the 12 step forum and started trying to poke holes or criticize the BB and the steps we would be promptly shut down. Anyone is free to open their own thread to talk about mixing recovery methods and how they took parts from different ones to create their own hybrid success story. I think it would be a very interesting and informative discussion. But hijacking Aleric's thread who is new to AVRT and saying negative things about AVRT isn't helpful.
There's peace in accepting that we can't control other people and their perspectives, or whether they are "allowed" to post those different perspectives on forums we don't control, nor should we try. All our perspectives are valid, including those with whom we don't agree, the only thing that spoils it is personal disrespect and nastiness.
I can do no more than repeat the above. A pattern has formed this year. When a member starts a thread regarding AVRT, Jeffrey and Fini appear, with negative comments about the technique.
That is factually correct, as you both well know. What I don't know, is what do you get out of constantly disparaging someone else's method of stopping drinking?
That is factually correct, as you both well know. What I don't know, is what do you get out of constantly disparaging someone else's method of stopping drinking?
yes, we've run into similar dead-end before.
it seems there is a confusing of questions and discussion with "negative comments" and "disparaging" the technique.
no-one has disparaged the technique or is making negative comments about the technique.
if discussing it, bringing comments and conversation and musings and asking folk about what they/we are saying runs frequently into these accusatory roadblocks...it is likely to get quieter here instead of more welcoming and it will be less comfortable for new people to approach. my guess.
for myself, i'm tired of this.
best to you.
quat
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: terra (mostly)firma
Posts: 4,823
Acid was a blast , when it was , so not when it wasn't, so not. I can't see me booking any trips either.
Coke was great , but when I ran out or couldn't find any , it wasn't that big of deal and lost its allure when the money dried up.
I was a confirmed pothead for years then just stopped. I tried smoking again a few years back , thought it would help to stop the drinking, quickly turned into daily smoking and drinking for about a year or so, stopped the pot but the drinking increased. Was always an intoxication enthusiast, just always seemed to be something about booze that made it so hard to shake. Probably a combination of the socially accepted view of alcohol , its availability and immediate effect but being an enthusiast was the base of it all.
That bit about the piles of data suggesting my brain is now back to normal , has the ole AV thinking a few buzzes and there , shouldn't really be all that bad, especially now that I proved I can stop.
Do you mean you are agnostic about drinking again , or consider yourself a confirmed teetotaller?
Acid was a blast , when it was , so not when it wasn't, so not. I can't see me booking any trips either.
Coke was great , but when I ran out or couldn't find any , it wasn't that big of deal and lost its allure when the money dried up.
I was a confirmed pothead for years then just stopped. I tried smoking again a few years back , thought it would help to stop the drinking, quickly turned into daily smoking and drinking for about a year or so, stopped the pot but the drinking increased. Was always an intoxication enthusiast, just always seemed to be something about booze that made it so hard to shake. Probably a combination of the socially accepted view of alcohol , its availability and immediate effect but being an enthusiast was the base of it all.
That bit about the piles of data suggesting my brain is now back to normal , has the ole AV thinking a few buzzes and there , shouldn't really be all that bad, especially now that I proved I can stop.
Acid was a blast , when it was , so not when it wasn't, so not. I can't see me booking any trips either.
Coke was great , but when I ran out or couldn't find any , it wasn't that big of deal and lost its allure when the money dried up.
I was a confirmed pothead for years then just stopped. I tried smoking again a few years back , thought it would help to stop the drinking, quickly turned into daily smoking and drinking for about a year or so, stopped the pot but the drinking increased. Was always an intoxication enthusiast, just always seemed to be something about booze that made it so hard to shake. Probably a combination of the socially accepted view of alcohol , its availability and immediate effect but being an enthusiast was the base of it all.
That bit about the piles of data suggesting my brain is now back to normal , has the ole AV thinking a few buzzes and there , shouldn't really be all that bad, especially now that I proved I can stop.
Weed was actually my first drug of choice, I liked that far more than alcohol at first, in my mid teens. Been 30+ years for that too, except for a couple instances 25-ish years ago when I tried it to see what I would think. I hated it, it made me paranoid and kept me stoned far long than I wanted to stay stoned.
Yeah, I understand on the addict voice, I've had those thoughts before too. Thing is, the way I see it, that path is forever barred to us even if our brains are completely "normal" (can take up to 10 years, from what I've read), because we will very quickly rebuild that chemical dependency and wind up right back where we were. In every single case I've ever heard of, that's what happens. I don't understand it, so perhaps our brains never fully return to "normal" (the differences may just not show up in brain images), but the empirical reality is that every single person I've ever heard about who became an addict, quit, and then went back to drinking, has wound up in an even worse place.
It helped me early on to remember just how horrible that place was for me at the end, regularly, never forget, and if I think on it long enough I can still tear up nearly 7 years later, it was an awful yawning dark hell. Drinking ever again = return to hell, no doubts whatsover. Now that association is pretty deeply stamped into my brain.
quat
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: terra (mostly)firma
Posts: 4,823
Jeffery
That 'forever barred' is where I see the permanence of AVRT and the Beast.In that sense, I'm kinda beyond a plan too. Mine is set, took about 30 minutes to institute it, years of working up to it and almost didn't make it. Finally freed myself and intend to stay that way, if that makes me not beyond a plan , it's probably just a matter of semantics. And in the case of AVRT trademarked ones at that
That 'forever barred' is where I see the permanence of AVRT and the Beast.In that sense, I'm kinda beyond a plan too. Mine is set, took about 30 minutes to institute it, years of working up to it and almost didn't make it. Finally freed myself and intend to stay that way, if that makes me not beyond a plan , it's probably just a matter of semantics. And in the case of AVRT trademarked ones at that
quat
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: terra (mostly)firma
Posts: 4,823
I think I have seen referenced a few times the idea that JT is aware of the use of his terms on forums and such and is not stringent in pursuing the rightful protections afforded him by laws of copyright and trademark, in those instances.
As long as dwtbd Publications Inc doesn't start marketing products on AVrT, it's cool
As long as dwtbd Publications Inc doesn't start marketing products on AVrT, it's cool
Currently Active Users Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)