Blogs


Notices

O'Reilly to Interview Richard Dawkins

Old 04-24-2007, 11:37 PM
  # 21 (permalink)  
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia, U.S.A.
Posts: 828
Originally Posted by marius404 View Post
The interview was short.
So short as to be meaningless. Ridiculous really. Heh, on R.D.'s website, there was an entire topic devoted to it as well as advertising of its coming, for weeks, LOL!!

Still, it was very good for me--I had never HEARD of Dawkins until stumbling onto here and weighing in quite at length in the God Delusion thread.

I must say I was very impressed during that short interview--with myself! Dawkins answered with pages from my own book. Check it --->

In reply to the old statement, "Well, you can't prove to me my God doesn't exist," he said, "We don't have to prove anything. The onus is on you."

When O'Reilly sez, "It takes more faith not to believe," R.D. is on it quickly and easily, explaining just as I did that science and the exploding field of theoretical physics accounts for far more than religion ever will. He said--direct quote, "Science is evermore piling on the understanding."

O'Reilly also makes some rank-amateur's mistakes, the one of course asking Dawkins to prove a negative; the other, citing Hitler as an athiest, which by now is just sheer ignorance.

I felt extremely... "schooled" watching that! Even though I'm not! I just know what I know from participating on here, and for that I really have members like marius, andshewas, doorknob and others to thank sincerely.

I know our discussion has been very brief--and I will endeavor to follow Morning Glory's requests from here out not to mock others' beliefs, but trust me you guys, it has been wonderfully enlightening while it lasted. Our discussion has prompted me to read up on things, intro'ing me to Sam Harris & Dawkins, and of course spawning the important lengthy "treatise" on organized religion that I shared.

I spent days on the those writings--this is why I call it "important." Though the subject be an old one, it was quite fresh to me to be exploring it in-depth for the first time. I have learned that debating religion is *amazingly* easy stuff. lol My mind can just incise and slice easily through so much. I can't even believe it's such a popular topic out there! There's scarcely anything to debate, really, as all falls under the weight of reason. ("Faith and reason," said Ten, "are forever irreconcilable.")

Didn't know he was an English chap! Very well-spoken, though O'Reilly too was very fair in this one.

Ten
Ten Chips Down is offline  
Old 04-25-2007, 12:24 AM
  # 22 (permalink)  
Administrator
 
Morning Glory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 10,657
Blog Entries: 2
I will endeavor to follow Morning Glory's requests from here out not to mock others' beliefs
("Faith and reason," said Ten, "are forever irreconcilable.")
That was short-lived don't you think?
Morning Glory is offline  
Old 04-25-2007, 12:44 AM
  # 23 (permalink)  
Member
 
Taking5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: LA - Lower Alabama
Posts: 5,069
What I don't understand is what this thread or the O'Reilley/Dawkins interview has to do with getting/staying sober.

Is Dawkins an alkie? Or has he said one way or another?
Taking5 is offline  
Old 04-25-2007, 09:06 PM
  # 24 (permalink)  
Knucklehead
 
doorknob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Davenport, WA
Posts: 4,005
Like Teach's thread, it has to do with the acceptance of secular belief by the mainstream, and thus the acceptance and availability of secular treatment and peer support in the future.
doorknob is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:56 AM.