Sober time requirement to share?
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: liverpool, england
Posts: 1,707
Have you ever been in a group held hostage by 2 or three individuals who will be talking for 20+ minute each? I have. I remember a women's meeting which I attended back in 2001.
While I fervently prayed for an egg timer, those same ladies hogged the Group Conscience. I stopped going.
Both my home group and the meeting I secretary don't have time limits but:
a) they are small
b) the people who attend are respectful of others and realize that it is not just about them but that others might want/need to share.
While I fervently prayed for an egg timer, those same ladies hogged the Group Conscience. I stopped going.
Both my home group and the meeting I secretary don't have time limits but:
a) they are small
b) the people who attend are respectful of others and realize that it is not just about them but that others might want/need to share.
i wasnt complaining about time limits on people sharing at the meeting i agree with you as i have been bored to tears myself with these long winded wind bags
my point is why do we seem to put limits or restraints on new comers when in the early days the new comers clearly would of had no restraints on them as people would be gald to here them talk in the meetings
like bill and bob when they took the thrid memeber into there home for a meeting did they say you can not share until you have been around for 12 months ?
my point is why do we seem to put limits or restraints on new comers when in the early days the new comers clearly would of had no restraints on them as people would be gald to here them talk in the meetings
It`s ok to stay sober
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Central NC
Posts: 20,903
several old sayings come to mind by reading this thread
it is suggested to listen for the first year and take the cotton out of your ears and put it in your mouth
the oldtimers had reasons for that
it is suggested to listen for the first year and take the cotton out of your ears and put it in your mouth
the oldtimers had reasons for that
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: liverpool, england
Posts: 1,707
so why tell new comers to do it when they didn't ?
like i said bill and bob certainly couldnt of told the new comers around when aa was just starting up to sit there and say nothing and listen to them 2 speak
Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,775
Actually I wish many old-timers would do that. I prefer listening to those new in AA much more.
Helps keep the importance of sobriety fresh for me.
Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Boston, Ma
Posts: 188
Its amazing that back then in 1955 this simple Program of Recovery had a 75% recovery rate. Today, we can't claim that, nowhere near that, its about 5% to 10% now. When I attend AA meetings, and they open the AA meeting by saying... we ask that only those with 90 days or less raise their hand, we want to hear only from newcomers first, and then we will open the meeting for anyone to share.
That completely confuses the hell out of me.
The entire AA meeting is listening to newcomers who do not have a defense against the first drink and have no clue how to get that defense against the first drink. But there we are, instead of listening to the Message of AA and the Solution.... we are listening to the Mess.
Now that is not a judgement of newcomers, they are exactly where they are suppose to be at, and the sad thing is, that is where they will remain until learning to listen to real Recovery... instead of talking.
Listening to an entire AA meeting of those who are brand new to AA, certainly isn't about the teaching and practicing of the 12 Steps.
In the forward to the 1955 second edition of Alcoholics Anonymous, there is an estimate that of alcoholics who came and really tried, 50 percent got permanently sober, 25 percent got permanently sober with some relapses, and 25 percent showed improvement.
In my experience the difference is in bringing people back to the Spiritual Solution. In many A.A. meetings today they don't talk about how to stay sober through the 12 steps, the Solution. They now conduct group therapy meetings, not A.A. meetings. And the newcomers, oldtimers and everyone in between pay the price for that one.
“Sobriety—the freedom from alcohol—through the teaching and practicing of the twelve steps is the sole purpose of an AA group.” — Bill Wilson
Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Boston, Ma
Posts: 188
That is why they are..Old Timers
Rarely have we seen a person fail who has thoroughly followed our path.
It`s ok to stay sober
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Central NC
Posts: 20,903
you are excally right Patricie
here`s a little something we read when opening our meeting
“Sobriety—the freedom from alcohol—through the teaching and practicing of the twelve steps is the sole purpose of an AA group.”
It was voted by group conscience that the purpose of this meeting is to help alcoholics achieve sobriety by the studying, discussing, and practicing of the twelve steps as they are laid out in the Big Book.
It has been our hard-learned experience that other methods did not work with us. Some of us have tried other methods and our results were disastrous, until we looked at the basic and simple approach the Big Book offers.
We ask only that discussion be limited to the step being studied tonight. It has become apparent to us that when we stopped blaming people, places, and things for our problems, and decided to take an honest and fearless look at ourselves as the root cause of our alcoholism, and decided to apply these twelve principles in our lives, we got better.
here`s a little something we read when opening our meeting
“Sobriety—the freedom from alcohol—through the teaching and practicing of the twelve steps is the sole purpose of an AA group.”
It was voted by group conscience that the purpose of this meeting is to help alcoholics achieve sobriety by the studying, discussing, and practicing of the twelve steps as they are laid out in the Big Book.
It has been our hard-learned experience that other methods did not work with us. Some of us have tried other methods and our results were disastrous, until we looked at the basic and simple approach the Big Book offers.
We ask only that discussion be limited to the step being studied tonight. It has become apparent to us that when we stopped blaming people, places, and things for our problems, and decided to take an honest and fearless look at ourselves as the root cause of our alcoholism, and decided to apply these twelve principles in our lives, we got better.
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 1,003
Most conventions offer a "Longtimer's Only" meeting which packs the room. The sobriety time requirements vary, of course, depending on location.
Some areas have meetings that are strictly for member with a certain amount of sobriety time and up.
Some groups never ask for volunteers and only call on people, often calling on the same people again and again. Some groups use Red Ball method, where the person sharing picks the next person sharing. Some groups have a policy of 6 months sobriety to chair a meeting. Some groups actually state.....please listen if you have 30 days or less of sobriety.
These practices are up to the group, decided by group conscience and, therefore, quite OK. Groups are autonomous.
I personally enjoy getting to know newcomers, and that's why I call on them to share. And most people are reasonable, catching onto a 5 minute timeframe.
Some areas have meetings that are strictly for member with a certain amount of sobriety time and up.
Some groups never ask for volunteers and only call on people, often calling on the same people again and again. Some groups use Red Ball method, where the person sharing picks the next person sharing. Some groups have a policy of 6 months sobriety to chair a meeting. Some groups actually state.....please listen if you have 30 days or less of sobriety.
These practices are up to the group, decided by group conscience and, therefore, quite OK. Groups are autonomous.
I personally enjoy getting to know newcomers, and that's why I call on them to share. And most people are reasonable, catching onto a 5 minute timeframe.
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 285
a mike and a podium ?? whats that all about ?
dont you have meetings were you guys sit around a table ?
we normaly sit around a table there can be as many as 30 or more fill up the room
someone will share there story but they will need 12 months to be in the chair but even that is open at times, but after 20 mins or so the meeting then gets thrown open for all in the room to share back
dont you have meetings were you guys sit around a table ?
we normaly sit around a table there can be as many as 30 or more fill up the room
someone will share there story but they will need 12 months to be in the chair but even that is open at times, but after 20 mins or so the meeting then gets thrown open for all in the room to share back
We have big mike and podium speaker meetings. Did that once, no desire to do it again! lol My homegroup is growing in leaps and bounds, but we still manage to squeeze us all around tables (with a few extra chairs). I think we've been averaging about 60 or so lately. It's cozy, but I still much prefer being squashed in next to people over having to stand up at a podium!
Random question that came up for me while reading the responses...how much sober time do you think it takes to be considered an old-timer?
Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,775
Years ago and out of the blue I was asked years back to speak at a meeting in Pacific Beach, San Diego Cal. I said fine but half way through a guy stood up and walked out. When I was finished nobody said much to me and I thought I must be a pretty crappy speaker. In retrospect I realized my experience wasn't what that group (or at least some in attendance) wanted to hear. I had a real lousy experience and if they "vetted" me beforehand this might have been avoided. I guessed they figured because I walked into room (I was visitor) I knew what I was getting into.
Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,775
Hi Tommy,
Its amazing that back then in 1955 this simple Program of Recovery had a 75% recovery rate. Today, we can't claim that, nowhere near that, its about 5% to 10% now. When I attend AA meetings, and they open the AA meeting by saying... we ask that only those with 90 days or less raise their hand, we want to hear only from newcomers first, and then we will open the meeting for anyone to share.
That completely confuses the hell out of me.
Its amazing that back then in 1955 this simple Program of Recovery had a 75% recovery rate. Today, we can't claim that, nowhere near that, its about 5% to 10% now. When I attend AA meetings, and they open the AA meeting by saying... we ask that only those with 90 days or less raise their hand, we want to hear only from newcomers first, and then we will open the meeting for anyone to share.
That completely confuses the hell out of me.
But as far as why some people end up leaving the rooms of AA? I'm sure there are a lot of reasons but pushing recovery on newcomers imo doesn't help. There are members that attend my regular meetings who are in "real recovery" and you should see it. They all but climb over chairs to get at those new. Does anyone actually believe pushing the program on people is wise? Yes, I know it works for some but how many does it chase away?
I recall my second meeting where some members were on me like white on rice. It was such a turn-off but fortunately I had gone to a meeting the night before (my first) which was a very positive experience.
I think encouraging new comers to share is a great idea! It will do two important things at once... Get them involved in the meeting, let other people know something(s) about them. However, I am not a big fan of the idea that someone sharing will encourage old timers to the program to reach out and "help" them. A person cannot be helped unless they want help. It doesn't matter how much they speak at a meeting. On a similar note, allowing a person early in sobriety will most definitely encourage others to reach out to them and get to know them and may result in that newcomer getting a job at the meeting as a greeter, coffee, pamphlets, etc.
I attended speaker meetings only early in my sobriety and Thinking back, i would have been shy to share my story but I remember being asked to share 1year into my sobriety and it felt great and I made lots more friends after that and I am sure sharing earlier would have done me more good than bad.
I attended speaker meetings only early in my sobriety and Thinking back, i would have been shy to share my story but I remember being asked to share 1year into my sobriety and it felt great and I made lots more friends after that and I am sure sharing earlier would have done me more good than bad.
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Maryland
Posts: 8
I would not attend any meeting where new comers were not allowed to share.
These rules are just made to oppress others and inflate the egos of old timers. No one is perfect in AA, and no one should have authority over others in the groups in my opinion.
These rules are just made to oppress others and inflate the egos of old timers. No one is perfect in AA, and no one should have authority over others in the groups in my opinion.
Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Boston, Ma
Posts: 188
Percentages? I think they're all suspect.
But as far as why some people end up leaving the rooms of AA? I'm sure there are a lot of reasons but pushing recovery on newcomers imo doesn't help. There are members that attend my regular meetings who are in "real recovery" and you should see it. They all but climb over chairs to get at those new. Does anyone actually believe pushing the program on people is wise? Yes, I know it works for some but how many does it chase away?
I recall my second meeting where some members were on me like white on rice. It was such a turn-off but fortunately I had gone to a meeting the night before (my first) which was a very positive experience.
But as far as why some people end up leaving the rooms of AA? I'm sure there are a lot of reasons but pushing recovery on newcomers imo doesn't help. There are members that attend my regular meetings who are in "real recovery" and you should see it. They all but climb over chairs to get at those new. Does anyone actually believe pushing the program on people is wise? Yes, I know it works for some but how many does it chase away?
I recall my second meeting where some members were on me like white on rice. It was such a turn-off but fortunately I had gone to a meeting the night before (my first) which was a very positive experience.
But as far as why some people end up leaving the rooms of AA?
When the Treatment Centers got involved (and I have nothing against Treatment Centers, they do what they are suppose to do, get the booze out) they gave newly sober people information and some good information too, nothing to do with Alcoholics Anonymous, and much to do about "therapy".
But those newcomers began coming into AA meetings and all they wanted to talk about is what they learned at the Treatment Centers, therapy. Slowly but surely the 12 Steps of Real Recovery were watered down, and for the most part simply disappeared from Our AA Group meetings. Replaced with My Day, My Way which has no real recovery at all....because just venting never helped anyone to stay sober.
The Fellowship has gotten away from why we are there... we are there to pass on the Program of AA, the 12 Steps. The Program of Alcoholics Anonymous has never changed, Recovery from Alcoholism has never changed..... but the Fellowship has.
There is a simple reason that AA used to have very high Recovery percentages and some don't any longer.... and it is as simple as this:
“Sobriety—the freedom from alcohol—through the teaching and practicing of the twelve steps is the sole purpose of an AA group.” — Bill Wilson
"Rarely have we seen a person fail who has thoroughly followed our path."
Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,775
Well, you might not. However, there are plenty of members in "real recovery" (see Pacific Group) who do. It's their way or the highway and heaven help anyone who disagrees. I'm not surprised people run for the hills. The cult-like vibe some meetings give off is unappealing to say the least.
Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,775
While I agree venting without a solution isn't something I want to hear either. I'm equally turned off by meetings where it's all smiles/happy recovery talk with a creepy vibe.
Fortunately, there are many AA meetings which are somewhere in the middle and that's the way I like it.
Currently Active Users Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)