SoberRecovery : Alcoholism Drug Addiction Help and Information

SoberRecovery : Alcoholism Drug Addiction Help and Information (https://www.soberrecovery.com/forums/)
-   Newcomers to Recovery (https://www.soberrecovery.com/forums/newcomers-recovery/)
-   -   We CAN be social drinkers? (https://www.soberrecovery.com/forums/newcomers-recovery/139302-we-can-social-drinkers.html)

stone 12-16-2007 01:36 PM

.I posted a pic called 'Leno' here that looked like your avatar Octo.

I removed because it looked like I was insulting you! It had 'blah' blah' coming out of his head, lol. I hadnt noticed it was animated until I posted it! So I hadnt seen that part. :)

Jersey Nonny 12-16-2007 01:47 PM


Originally Posted by slash (Post 1604116)
I have mixed feelings...I agree that one shouldn't allow this to upset him/her. However, I also feel that it is the "take care of each other" concept that leads us to be upset. After all, if I am not concerned with the recovery programs/concepts of others, I won't be upset by them. Don't get me wrong - I believe whole heartedly that I should be there for others (addict or not) and I enjoy doing so. But being there as support and to offer my experience is not synonymous with care taking. In fact, if we are "taking care" of another addict, we are doing him/her a disservice IMO

Whenever anyone, anywhere reaches out for help, I want the hand of AA always to be there--and, for that I am responsible.

I'm responsible to help those who want help...the dimwits who wrote this dangerous book obviously don't want my help or any part of AA. Protest all they might, I personally think they're dissatisfied alcoholics who are still looking for a way to drink "responsibly"...misery loves company, and they're determined to convince others to take this road to active alcoholism with them.

When I referred to "taking care", I certainly didn't mean "enabling", which would, of course, be a disservice...and not helpful to him/her or myself. I think I know the difference.

slash 12-16-2007 02:49 PM


Originally Posted by Jersey Nonny (Post 1604188)
Whenever anyone, anywhere reaches out for help, I want the hand of AA always to be there--and, for that I am responsible.

I'm responsible to help those who want help...the dimwits who wrote this dangerous book obviously don't want my help or any part of AA. Protest all they might, I personally think they're dissatisfied alcoholics who are still looking for a way to drink "responsibly"...misery loves company, and they're determined to convince others to take this road to active alcoholism with them.

When I referred to "taking care", I certainly didn't mean "enabling", which would, of course, be a disservice...and not helpful to him/her or myself. I think I know the difference.


The last line of your post sounds as if you took offense to my post. If that is so, I apologize. Your earlier post said "take care". This post says "help" These are 2 entirely different concepts so I don't think I was out of line in my misunderstanding. I was simply stating my opinion, not trying to de-value anyone elses. I am certainly not suggesting that you don't know the difference between helping and enabling. I still prefer to help one to be better able to take care of oneself as opposed to taking care.

Perhaps the folks who wrote this book are enjoying great success in this approach - Of course, it is my belief that IF that is the case, they were never alcoholic at all...but maybe they truly believe that they are. Maybe they believe they found something that works for them and are trying to share that with others just as those who find success in whatever program of recovery he/she has chosen does the same. Maybe I just prefer to look for the best in people but if we are going to make assumptions about people and their intentions, why not focus on positive rather than negative....

mike_mass 12-16-2007 02:54 PM


Originally Posted by Hevyn (Post 1603197)
I know we don't need any more negativity, but this worries me, so thought I'd get your views. I just read about a book called "Phoenix in a Bottle", written by an alcoholic couple, Lillian & Murdoch MacDonald. (They have challeneged AA to a debate on this subject.) They maintain that Alcoholism is not a progressive or incurable disease, but a response to a dysfunctional childhood. We are not addicted to alcohol, but to the escape we find when drinking. If we get to the underlying problem of why we need that escape, we'll be cured of our drinking problems! The reason I'm concerned is, they are trying to convince us that once we find out what's causing us to self-medicate, we can then go on to be social drinkers - as they have done. I know we've said many times on here, whatever works for you is what matters, but how much damage will this "revelation" do?

I would wait a few years to see how they turn out (remember the founder of Moderation Management?). Anyway, have you seen a picture of those two? They don't look too like they should be drimking.

Hevyn 12-16-2007 03:33 PM

The reason I've been upset, Jersey, is because I can imagine my own reaction to that book a few months ago. Until recently, I would have gladly "drunk the kool-aid" and gone with ANY idea that might have enabled me to continue drinking. Damage will be done here, and even though we should be able to think for ourselves, we are so vulnerable while we're trying to find our way to sobriety. There was a man in California years ago who wrote a book about being able to moderate - in the book there was a chart where you could keep track of what you drank. It made such perfect sense!I started out with great resolve. It only took about a month for me to totally tank once again. I know moderation is not possible for me. I just feel for those who will embrace this idea and end up being hurt by these irresponsible people.

swmnkdinthervr 12-16-2007 04:20 PM


Originally Posted by MMAARRKK (Post 1604071)
This is a tough one ...

I believed alcoholism was a physical disease until this year. In my own case I realize it's a mental weakness. I know that if I have one drink I will mentally want more and more, but my body does not really want or need it.

I don't doubt that some alcoholics can be social drinkers: many probably can't.

A large number of psychological disorders are chemical imbalances...they are in fact diseases...recognized by the medical community...our condition of addiction is precipitated by a chemical change in our brain. I must agree however that we have psychological barriers that must be addressed as well...some consider them our character defects or contributing to them...

Octoman 12-17-2007 01:16 AM

A social drinker doesnt care whether they drink or not. My wife is a normal drinker and it is of no consequence if she doesnt have a drink. she enjoys a glass of wine sometimes and occasionally may have one too many. But she can can also go weeks or even months without alcohol without giving it a second throught. It is just not an issue to her and if she was told she could never drink again it would be about as upsetting to her as it would for me and you being told we could never drink apple juice again. No big deal.

Therefore, to drink like a social drinker as these people suggest should mean never thinking about it and abstaining with ease for indeterminate peiods of time. Clearly they have failed on both fronts here. the fact that they are even taking time to label themselves as normal drinkers in my opinion points to an abnormal relationship with alcohol. I think what they are doing is drinking LIKE a social drinker which is wholly different to BEING one. I dont feel the need to write a book explaining how I am able to drink coffee like a normal person. I just can and until now I have never really thought about it.

I believe it is possible for an alcoholic to create an illusion of controlled drinking even for quite long periods of time. but it takes a huge amount of efffort and anyone who has tried knows that drinking totally dominates your throughts and eventually it all falls apart. The closest thing an alcoholic can ever be to a normal social drinker is never drinking at all because thats the way most normal drinkers are most of the time anyway!

Pilgrim 12-17-2007 01:39 AM

Pink and Stone have already said what I would say.

Hevyn - I know what you mean. When I was still sick, I would have used that book to drink longer. I would have reached a lower bottom or maybe not have made it.

I will pray for them because I can feel resentment towards them. They are sick and need help. And I will pray for anyone who reads it who is truely alcoholic.

slash 12-17-2007 03:31 AM


Originally Posted by Octoman (Post 1604653)
A social drinker doesnt care whether they drink or not. My wife is a normal drinker and it is of no consequence if she doesnt have a drink. she enjoys a glass of wine sometimes and occasionally may have one too many. But she can can also go weeks or even months without alcohol without giving it a second throught. It is just not an issue to her and if she was told she could never drink again it would be about as upsetting to her as it would for me and you being told we could never drink apple juice again. No big deal.

Therefore, to drink like a social drinker as these people suggest should mean never thinking about it and abstaining with ease for indeterminate peiods of time. Clearly they have failed on both fronts here. the fact that they are even taking time to label themselves as normal drinkers in my opinion points to an abnormal relationship with alcohol. I think what they are doing is drinking LIKE a social drinker which is wholly different to BEING one. I dont feel the need to write a book explaining how I am able to drink coffee like a normal person. I just can and until now I have never really thought about it.

I believe it is possible for an alcoholic to create an illusion of controlled drinking even for quite long periods of time. but it takes a huge amount of efffort and anyone who has tried knows that drinking totally dominates your throughts and eventually it all falls apart. The closest thing an alcoholic can ever be to a normal social drinker is never drinking at all because thats the way most normal drinkers are most of the time anyway!

Well said, Octoman. My wife is also a social drinker, as are my sisters and parents and it is just as you describe.

bugsworth 12-17-2007 03:55 AM

Great post Octoman! My husband is the same way, he could care less!

Well, that is not entirely true, actually he despises alcohol now. I don't think you could pay him to drink. He has seen the horrors...not just the depth that alcohol brought me too, but he works in a place where he sees the devestation daily.

Now Oreos for him.....lol

indigo 12-17-2007 04:39 AM

I know I can't drink full stop and I don't want to either, that article is a killer it will undo so many peoples thinking.JMO

hairgirl 12-17-2007 08:05 AM


I never had a problem with alcohol, as I did with food, drugs, relationships.I was definately stuffing my feelings and numbing my pain with these things.You can't stop eating, but you have to learn how to control it, or you will get unhealthy.Relationships fall in the same, you have to set boundaries, or you will be involved in messy relationships.
The way I dealt with the pain and lonliness was wrong, I had to learn to let go of resentment and learn self respect.I don't agree with the authors, but I have reservations about this issue.If I never had a problem with drinking, why should I avoid it forever? I still eat and have relationships, and those things were definately problem areas.I know some will say, there is always a chance to develop a problem, but there is with anything I have abused already.It is confusing.I just stay sober because it is a step in my recovery.Will I drink again? Don't know for sure.I know I don't want to ever take drugs again,and I don't want to be obese again, but recovery is about the reasons you abused certain things, and those are what I am working on, soberly.Better to be clear headed.

Jersey Nonny 12-17-2007 09:46 AM


I still prefer to help one to be better able to take care of oneself as opposed to taking care.
Slash...I prefer to believe our intentions are the same, we're just wording it differently.


I just feel for those who will embrace this idea and end up being hurt by these irresponsible people.
Hevyn...I totally agree...but, I must accept the things I cannot change. If I thought it would have any effect to start a "ban the book" campaign, count me in!!! In the meantime, giving more thought to the authors of this book is just allowing them to "live rent free" in my head.

The publication alone of this book has already done damage...imagine all the passionate recovering alcoholics, like yourself, who are being adversely affected by the "social drinkers" concept being fostered by so-called alcoholics. I shudder to think of how many hapless souls will be led to near or total destruction, if they adopt the premise being put forth by these opportunists...are they really intent on improving the lives of fellow alcoholics, or just out to make a few dollars at their expense!?!

slash 12-17-2007 12:03 PM


Originally Posted by Jersey Nonny (Post 1605092)
[b]Slash...I prefer to believe our intentions are the same, we're just wording it differently.

b]

Ms. Nonny...I believe they are :)

Jersey Nonny 12-17-2007 01:11 PM

Psychologist's View - Depending on Knowledge of AA/Alcoholics
 

Originally Posted by kelsh (Post 1603526)
When I went to counseling back in 1970 my counselor told me that he didn't think I was an alcoholic but a person with life problems & that I drank to forget. Many years later this man was my boss and had a drinking problem. :skillet

I would quit for a year here and there but never stay quit. I went to AA about the same way and didn't get a sponsor or work the steps.

In 1988 I was at the end of another life event that I escaped from by drinking every day and all weekend. I finally came to the end of the road and asked for help again but this time I had to detox in a hospital, get help for depression/clinical and went to AA, got a sponsor, & worked the steps. :day4

That was 19 years ago and I am still sober and still being treated for my depression with a stability in both.

I wanted to be sober more than anything else in my life and I was willing to do everything suggested. I had a counselor for my depression and one for my alcoholism besides my daily AA meeting for the first year of my sobriety. It worked and it is still working today. :Dance7:
kelsh

Early in 1979, my daughter suggested I see a psychologist for my depression. I was separated from husband and still drinking, although he had stopped. The doc and I discussed everything under the son...but, never a word about his or my drinking. By the end of each session, I would be so emotionally drained, I would head straight to my favorite bar for a few "pick me ups"!

A few months later, I wound up in detox, and didn't make my scheduled session with the doc. I called her and said something to the effect, "I found out my problem...I'm an alcoholic, and I'm being detoxed for alcoholism." I don't think she was convinced, but that was her problem.

Two years later, having been divorced and going to AA, I became so depressed, I couldn't get out of bed to go to work...didn't feel like doing anything...not even drinking! I dragged myself back to the detox/rehab and begged for help. After a joint meeting of three of the counsellors, I was prescribed an anti-depressant and set up for lunch-time meetings with an alcoholism therapist whose Dad was an alcoholic and she was in Al-Anon. This gal could have written her own Big Book.

BTW...it was determined, during the next six months of therapy, that the depression was caused by my not having "grieved the divorce". I did a lot of in-depth soul searching, pretty much like a 4th and 5th...and came out the other side a much more serene recovering alcoholic.

Hevyn 12-17-2007 06:04 PM

Reading everyone's responses makes me so proud to be part of this community. You are an intelligent (brilliant at times), humerous, wonderfully helpful & kind group and I am so thankful to part of what we have here. How empty I would feel if I didn't have SR in my life.

Dee74 12-17-2007 06:50 PM

:amen:

D

Anodyne 12-17-2007 11:09 PM

I know I, personally, can never be a Social Drinker.
I think it's somewhat dangerous of them to tell people that "Sure! You Can Drink Socially, just get to the bottom of your issues and the 'addiction' goes away!"

I can't drink socially and I cannot drink responsibly. After two months sober I drank one day because..well no, I used being stressed out about something as a reason to drink. All it took was the first night, then I was on a bender, and I've been struggling mightily ever since then. Two, three, seven days sober, then bam, a night of drinking. And it's made me miserable.

The same thing would happen if I ever tried to drink socially. And, frankly, two or three drinks would just tick me off. I also notice the attacking of AA.
One thing in AA is that I haven't heard many people in AA attack other treatment paths, instead saying "whatever works for you, do it."

I am interested in this woman who started some other path of rehab that said you COULD drink, and she ended up killing someone in a DD accident?
Does anyone have any links about this or know the woman's name?

Room1 12-18-2007 01:45 AM

I haven't read all the posts as my head hurts to much this morning but like the poster above, I had 2 or so months sober and decided to try moderation, social drinking whatever you want to call it. It didn't work for me, once I drank that first night that was it, the cravings and the mental arguments were back in full force. Abstinence is the only way forward for me, I don't believe I would ever be in a place where I can "socially drink." One drink lead me back right where I was in a matter of a week.

nandm 12-18-2007 02:18 AM

I had lost the ability to be social by the end of my drinking career. So social drinking did not exist for me. :a043:

I have found that today I can be a social drinker but that is drinking ONLY NO alcohol drinks. And the bonus is, I don't have to worry about what I said or did the night before, no hangover, no blackouts, tend not to do or say really stupid things (although I have my moments,,,lol). :ghug2


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:48 AM.