My AH and I were going to divorce, but we've reconciled.
However, his atty had asked/demanded the same things that I demanded. I was fine with that since I had nothing to hide.
For instance, my AH was supposed to answer questions about whether he had wrongly taken other people's pain Rxs without their permission. AH knew that I had proof of that he had done so (including photos of the Rx bottles) and the sworn testimony of the people he had taken the Rxs from. While I was asked the same question, my AH knew that I wasn't guilty of doing the same and therefore he had no proof of anything. He didn't want to be exposed (because of his job), so he folded like a "cheap tent".
If you're innocent, then you have nothing to be afraid of. I had photos, texts, testimonies, recorded phone calls, etc. I had hard evidence and AH knew it. I played hardball and that shocked him.
In the end, MY DEMANDS were too much for my AH to take and he cried, "uncle". He knew that I had proof of his infractions, while I had no infractions to be exposed.