Originally Posted by
Last Call 
I am not getting this discussion I guess. I have only read through about 2/3 of the book, but I don't see RR trying to create any long term associations/dependencies. In fact what I read seems to indicate that once your thinking is "right" you become a normal person that doesn't drink. At that point you no longer need the book or anything else to stay sober. What am I missing?
We were responding to what TU said - about how people sort of resist or fight or are contemptuous against what they are dependent on. So if the assertion is one is dependent on or employing AVRT, then I guess we are somewhat dependent on it? I wasn't entirely sure what he meant actually (see his above comment), so I could be wrong. I don't know, now I'm confused as to what we're talking about too...
