this is, for me, where it gets entirely illogical.
when i hear here repeatedly that IT has no power, IT is WANT but you are the actioner in fulfilling the want, then saying you were led by IT, though you chose ( i cannot right now paste and copy on this silly old ipad, or i would paste Gary's exact phrasing)........either you freely choose or you are led, or your choice is choice but not really free choice.....in which case YOU are not in charge.
Or maybe in the OP the separation is incomplete?
the immorality, if there is any (and that is something i felt, in my drinking) is in choosing , allowing to be led, and not in IT. iT has no morals, or lack. It is a drive.
but i will freely admit i have no good understanding of AVRT, and my question pertains to what seems contradictory to what i usually seem to hear here.
do you see where i'm not able to follow? and why?