Originally Posted by
Joe Nerv 
The person who wrote it obviously wasn't the greatest writer, as that line turtle quoted could be read several different ways, but again, the gyst of it is:
non 12 step - 70% success
12 step - less than 10%
I'm quite certain that was what she meant.
Non 12 step treatment is clearly better! I mean, what would you choose if you knew nothing of the different methods? A 12 step rehab, where you're chances are less than 10%, or a non 12 step rehab, where your chances are 70%. Especially since rehabs can cost lots of out of the pocket money today.
Somebody please tell me why I'm even arguing this?
Joe I finally read that article and it strikes me, apart from being pretty clearly biased, it reads like an advert - like a piece of sales copy.
'New and improved Alpecin, with Caffeine is proven to keep your hair silky smooth, unlike more traditional non-caffeine based shampoos. If you like having dirty, dry hair non-caffeinated shampoo is probably right for you but....' etc
Let's park it in the 'None of my Business file, and get back to trudging the road to Happy (though ocassionally irritated) Destiny
P