I am not sure I wanna play vinepest. I have done phorum filosophy before and it takes a lot of effort to keep it egoless. The point of my post was that Zencat asked for proof, and we accept a lot of
a priori knowledge which is unprovable - consciousness was just the first thing that came to mind. The acceptance of the unprovability of some knowledge is definitely part of my recovery.
If you want to resort to inductive reason to deconstruct my post, go for it. For my part, inductive thought never produces rigorous knowledge outside of a formal system and Kant still pwns Hume. I’ll let you have the last word if you want…
Take care and welcome to secular town.