arguments
its something i don't like about rational recovery. I basically love his book for the plan itself, it makes the most sense to me, but really can't stand the founder as grateful as i am for finally having someone that explains it clearly to me. But over 2/3's of the book is just him bashing other programs, arguing about this or that. Book should have been 50 pages long. I can't imagine what the guy was like when he was drunk if he's like this sober.
i actually follow that small part from the AA big book on this one, to avoid arguments.
but this needs a discussion. how do you handle arguments now that you've sobered up. What is working for you?