A road less travelled....
A road less travelled....
ARGHHHHHHH!!!! This book by Dr. Scott Peck was the first I found cheeply for my new course (listed as suggested reading). IT'S DRIVING ME NUTS!!!! Anyone else read it? (Very famous)
I so want to vent but I'd get too heated and give a rotten view of myself. I have dragged my butt through the first 50 odd pages (can't seem to read more than half a page at a time) and have bought a new Oliver Sacks book as reward for when I finish this one.
So shoot me for arrogance but if that plonka comes up with one more cheesey one liner or insanely stupid statment (which seems to be the entire contents of each page) - ok I'm just going to have to keep reading because I'm determined.....
I mentioned the book to a friend I saw yesterday, an old head teacher who's a star and giving me a hand with my presentations. I tried a semi polite summary and then had a brain fart and called Scotty a flippin' idiot - she gafawed laughing and added the word 'freak'.
Come back Mr. Sacks, with your sense of wonder, sense of all that we don't yet know and wipe the memory of Peckland with it's self smooching, half baked panacia to life!!
Oh and do I REALLY need half page long descriptions of why any client refusing his treatment was sicker than he had first thought? Not to mention the dreadful sickness of those who keep coming back and never get anywhere! It left me wanted to say 'Why Peck - you're a very sensitive flower aren't you?'
My review - the book is a brain blender!!
I so want to vent but I'd get too heated and give a rotten view of myself. I have dragged my butt through the first 50 odd pages (can't seem to read more than half a page at a time) and have bought a new Oliver Sacks book as reward for when I finish this one.
So shoot me for arrogance but if that plonka comes up with one more cheesey one liner or insanely stupid statment (which seems to be the entire contents of each page) - ok I'm just going to have to keep reading because I'm determined.....
I mentioned the book to a friend I saw yesterday, an old head teacher who's a star and giving me a hand with my presentations. I tried a semi polite summary and then had a brain fart and called Scotty a flippin' idiot - she gafawed laughing and added the word 'freak'.
Come back Mr. Sacks, with your sense of wonder, sense of all that we don't yet know and wipe the memory of Peckland with it's self smooching, half baked panacia to life!!
Oh and do I REALLY need half page long descriptions of why any client refusing his treatment was sicker than he had first thought? Not to mention the dreadful sickness of those who keep coming back and never get anywhere! It left me wanted to say 'Why Peck - you're a very sensitive flower aren't you?'
My review - the book is a brain blender!!
Eq
I have read the book and another book he wrote "Farther Down the Road Less Traveled" I also read the book "People of the Lie".
Since it is on your reckomended reading list I guess you might as well get thru it the best you can. I can see how you feel the way you do about his writing. I can also see how his writing appeals to certain people who are looking for answers to their plight in life.
It goes to show you that all the people cannot be pleased all the time and you may be one of the unpleased at some point in life.
I have read the book and another book he wrote "Farther Down the Road Less Traveled" I also read the book "People of the Lie".
Since it is on your reckomended reading list I guess you might as well get thru it the best you can. I can see how you feel the way you do about his writing. I can also see how his writing appeals to certain people who are looking for answers to their plight in life.
It goes to show you that all the people cannot be pleased all the time and you may be one of the unpleased at some point in life.
I know I've got to get through it and I will - I'm tempting myself!!
It has left me wondering whether I've made a wise decision for me to venture out of science and into airport lounge reading - but then I may find that course leaders are no more impressed than me and are looking to critique. For that I'll have to wait and see.
I find it has a seductive quality in flattering those who agree and defining as sick those who don't. Only that's not what I find seductive! It's crammed with sweeping statements heavily divorced from reality. While reading his assessment of anyone who lies what struck me is the number of people for who 'facing the consequences of truth' can mean violence and on occasion death. We live in a world that includes countries with collapsed states, run by dictators, even in 'peachy' democracies spouses can live in fear of violence and children who confess to breaking the cookie jar can wind up in hospital. To simply suggest that fear of a consequence is symptomatic of mental illness is bizarre, reckless and banal.
And that would be one of many issues I have with this guy!!
It has left me wondering whether I've made a wise decision for me to venture out of science and into airport lounge reading - but then I may find that course leaders are no more impressed than me and are looking to critique. For that I'll have to wait and see.
I find it has a seductive quality in flattering those who agree and defining as sick those who don't. Only that's not what I find seductive! It's crammed with sweeping statements heavily divorced from reality. While reading his assessment of anyone who lies what struck me is the number of people for who 'facing the consequences of truth' can mean violence and on occasion death. We live in a world that includes countries with collapsed states, run by dictators, even in 'peachy' democracies spouses can live in fear of violence and children who confess to breaking the cookie jar can wind up in hospital. To simply suggest that fear of a consequence is symptomatic of mental illness is bizarre, reckless and banal.
And that would be one of many issues I have with this guy!!
You want to consider when this book was written too and, the concepts expressed are to help you understand where others have been. I guess you were a young child when this book was written. You were most likely influenced by this book because undoubtably there was at least one person somewhere around you that had read this book when it was "hot".
My first psyc course years and years ago the book: "I'm Okay You're Okay" was on my suggested reading list...I didn't like it but, I was able to see how the concepts of this best selling book soaked into the culture around me and I still see it's influence today. In another psyc course another one of this authors books was on the suggested reading list: "What Do You Say After you Say Hello" I really liked this one and have offered it to many people to read but, very few have taken my offer, I don't know why. This book helped me to see so much.
My first psyc course years and years ago the book: "I'm Okay You're Okay" was on my suggested reading list...I didn't like it but, I was able to see how the concepts of this best selling book soaked into the culture around me and I still see it's influence today. In another psyc course another one of this authors books was on the suggested reading list: "What Do You Say After you Say Hello" I really liked this one and have offered it to many people to read but, very few have taken my offer, I don't know why. This book helped me to see so much.
I reckoned it was perhaps time to learn a little about Dr. Peck....
The Guardian which is one of the UK's more reliable news papers held his orbituary.
Here's a quote from Paeck himself:
and a little of their bio of him...
Reference and full article:
http://books.guardian.co.uk/obituari...585171,00.html
Perhaps now I'll read it with a little more interest - how did he get so well followed? What is it he's offering that people so want? - because it sure as hell isn't his capacity to live life honourably or his relationship wisdom.
The Guardian which is one of the UK's more reliable news papers held his orbituary.
Here's a quote from Paeck himself:
"Half the time when people want to touch my robe, it feels incredibly icky - yuck! The rest of the time, it feels very good, honest, right."
The opening words were: "Life is difficult." This was a pronouncement to which Peck could personally attest. He spent much of his life immersed in cheap gin, chain-smoking cigarettes and inhaling cannabis, and being persistently unfaithful to his wife, who eventually divorced him. He also went through estrangement with two of his three children.
http://books.guardian.co.uk/obituari...585171,00.html
Perhaps now I'll read it with a little more interest - how did he get so well followed? What is it he's offering that people so want? - because it sure as hell isn't his capacity to live life honourably or his relationship wisdom.
In every piece of BS there is a grain of truth.
Originally Posted by equus
Perhaps now I'll read it with a little more interest - how did he get so well followed? What is it he's offering that people so want? - because it sure as hell isn't his capacity to live life honourably or his relationship wisdom.
I always liked the image of the wise man on the top of the mountain ... content with his own company and not needing to push beliefs ... there to be questioned if someone really needed to.
Interesting that this guru was really not a guru. Actions speak louder than words.
love and peace,
Brigid
Gosh I hated that book Equus. Good luck getting through it.
I loved People of the Lie though, but then Peck took that too far in his next book. Ah well, we are all human...even authors.
I loved People of the Lie though, but then Peck took that too far in his next book. Ah well, we are all human...even authors.
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Big Woods
Posts: 521
Originally Posted by equus
how did he get so well followed? What is it he's offering that people so want? - because it sure as hell isn't his capacity to live life honourably or his relationship wisdom.
Originally Posted by brigid
Makes you wonder what makes people preach, is it their own issues?
Because we're so directly able to relate to those things, we know how they manifest themselves and can see how disruptive/ distorted that way of thinking/ being affects everything around us, including our own thinking.
Nah - I don't buy it. Each to their own but I'm not applying that to my reasoning - it just makes no sense to me.
alconaut
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Motor City
Posts: 729
Originally Posted by equus
ARGHHHHHHH!!!! This book by Dr. Scott Peck was the first I found cheeply for my new course (listed as suggested reading). IT'S DRIVING ME NUTS!!!! Anyone else read it? (Very famous)
So shoot me for arrogance but if that plonka comes up with one more cheesey one liner or insanely stupid statment (which seems to be the entire contents of each page) - ok I'm just going to have to keep reading because I'm determined.....
If/when I ever did find out who John Galt was, I don't remember, and the ending was an anti-climactic experience (for me, anyway). I suppose it's all what the reader gathers from the contents and resonates with.
Anyway, The Road Less Traveled is a book a lot of people have high regards for. Your comments are unexpected and refreshing, as always!
.....she gafawed laughing and added the word 'freak'.
Come back Mr. Sacks, with your sense of wonder, sense of all that we don't yet know and wipe the memory of Peckland with it's self smooching, half baked panacia to life!!
Come back Mr. Sacks, with your sense of wonder, sense of all that we don't yet know and wipe the memory of Peckland with it's self smooching, half baked panacia to life!!
((((Equus)))).
I have huge respect for the effort that goes into gaining qualifications - but I can't help but note that those who have them still dispute so many things; because of that, like age, I reckoned alone it cannot make a person right.
Qualifications should give a person the ability to reason what they say and support 'fact' with evidence - so where that's noticable in it's absence I can't help but be sceptical.
I've just finished a page where he suggest that omitting ANY information from children is lying and teach them to grow up dishonest, he includes in that rows between parents, financial strife, drug taking, ANYTHING. It somehow doesn't surprise me he spent years estranged from his own kids - I suppose they voted with their feet. I don't believe kids want to hear about evry argument, debt, affair and intoxicated night! It's diferent when a child asks or when there's a need to know.
Qualifications should give a person the ability to reason what they say and support 'fact' with evidence - so where that's noticable in it's absence I can't help but be sceptical.
I've just finished a page where he suggest that omitting ANY information from children is lying and teach them to grow up dishonest, he includes in that rows between parents, financial strife, drug taking, ANYTHING. It somehow doesn't surprise me he spent years estranged from his own kids - I suppose they voted with their feet. I don't believe kids want to hear about evry argument, debt, affair and intoxicated night! It's diferent when a child asks or when there's a need to know.
Originally Posted by equus
You know - I've never bought that theory. If I see some bloke kick ten kinds of ** out of a dog or kid, OH my feelings go sky high, I'm SO BOTHERED. Should I then worry that my concern only comes from some hidden subconscious desire to do likewise? Even worse, should I examine myself until I don't feel bothered at all?
Nah - I don't buy it. Each to their own but I'm not applying that to my reasoning - it just makes no sense to me.
Nah - I don't buy it. Each to their own but I'm not applying that to my reasoning - it just makes no sense to me.
I don't think it is a black and white thing, I definitely look within these days when I find an annoying behaviour and try to be honest with myself ... I sometimes find it. But that is good, once found and recognised I can change it, or accept it within myself, I am not perfect after all, I am just me. Changing / accepting it increases my tolerance and patience for others.
love and peace,
Brigid
Originally Posted by Autumn
It reminds me of when I picked up Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand[.......]If/when I ever did find out who John Galt was, I don't remember, and the ending was an anti-climactic experience (for me, anyway).
She had a brilliant idea and did a good job for the most part of the book, but the woman was full of herself and used her book as a means of spilling herself onto the reader.
But for her to come over to this country, learn to speak english, write it and then use the language as she had, well, I give her credit for that. She was much more articulate than most people (including myself) who are born with english as their primary language.
I Need to know....
Originally Posted by equus
What makes it hard work and annoying is wading through the codswallop!!
I love the sound of that word.
Bobby
alconaut
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Motor City
Posts: 729
Originally Posted by Bobby4444
I enjoyed Atlas Shrugged a great deal; however, I must admit that I read it with a bias attitude. I was once upon a time a huge admirer of Ayn Rand. But as far as your comment goes, that ending was brutal. I think it consisted of two-million pages of getting to the point, which really did lead to an anti-climactic ending, as you described.
When I got to the ending, I was disappointed in that I had made a pact with myself not to read another book until I finished Atlas Shrugged. I realized how silly a pact that was when the ending came. It was just so flat. I'll never do that again.
But for her to come over to this country, learn to speak english, write it and then use the language as she had, well, I give her credit for that. She was much more articulate than most people (including myself) who are born with english as their primary language.
And yeah - she was an amazing writer to be sure.
Currently Active Users Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)