Doesn't every method require an element of faith?
Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,654
I view my Big Plan as an anti-virus program which filters out and discards the AV (Addictive Voice) by operating the linked AVRT (Addictive Voice Recognition Technique).
With almost 17 months sobriety (after over twenty years addiction) I find AVRT works predominantly subconsciously, due to my BP. Very little AV rises into my consciousness, due to neuro plasticity. Any that does, is ignored, effortlessly.
With almost 17 months sobriety (after over twenty years addiction) I find AVRT works predominantly subconsciously, due to my BP. Very little AV rises into my consciousness, due to neuro plasticity. Any that does, is ignored, effortlessly.
I view my Big Plan as an anti-virus program which filters out and discards the AV (Addictive Voice) by operating the linked AVRT (Addictive Voice Recognition Technique).
With almost 17 months sobriety (after over twenty years addiction) I find AVRT works predominantly subconsciously, due to my BP. Very little AV rises into my consciousness, due to neuro plasticity. Any that does, is ignored, effortlessly.
With almost 17 months sobriety (after over twenty years addiction) I find AVRT works predominantly subconsciously, due to my BP. Very little AV rises into my consciousness, due to neuro plasticity. Any that does, is ignored, effortlessly.
Well, it makes little sense to write a program if you don't intend to run it - they naturally belong together.
Let me ask you a straightforward question in return.
Do you believe that the practice of recognising and separating from AV is required or is not required in order to quit for good?
I'm not saying there's a right or wrong answer to this btw but the answer is straightforward either way.
Let me ask you a straightforward question in return.
Do you believe that the practice of recognising and separating from AV is required or is not required in order to quit for good?
I'm not saying there's a right or wrong answer to this btw but the answer is straightforward either way.
quat
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: terra (mostly)firma
Posts: 4,823
Well, it makes little sense to write a program if you don't intend to run it - they naturally belong together.
Let me ask you a straightforward question in return.
Do you believe that the practice of recognising and separating from AV is required or is not required in order to quit for good?
I'm not saying there's a right or wrong answer to this btw but the answer is straightforward either way.
Let me ask you a straightforward question in return.
Do you believe that the practice of recognising and separating from AV is required or is not required in order to quit for good?
I'm not saying there's a right or wrong answer to this btw but the answer is straightforward either way.
Do you see, as an example , the difference between the above sentiments?
Well, I would like to clarify something first if you don't mind.
All I've been saying it seems to me is that the practice of separating from AV is required in order to stay quit for life. Making the decision to do so is not in itself sufficient to guarantee success.
My reading is that you disagree with this and have been maintaining that making a BP alone is required.
Is that an accurate description of what you have been saying and do you disagree with anything in what I've just said?
All I've been saying it seems to me is that the practice of separating from AV is required in order to stay quit for life. Making the decision to do so is not in itself sufficient to guarantee success.
My reading is that you disagree with this and have been maintaining that making a BP alone is required.
Is that an accurate description of what you have been saying and do you disagree with anything in what I've just said?
quat
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: terra (mostly)firma
Posts: 4,823
Well, I would like to clarify something first if you don't mind.
All I've been saying it seems to me is that the practice of separating from AV is required in order to stay quit for life. Making the decision to do so is not in itself sufficient to guarantee success.
My reading is that you disagree with this and have been maintaining that making a BP alone is required.
Is that an accurate description of what you have been saying and do you disagree with anything in what I've just said?
All I've been saying it seems to me is that the practice of separating from AV is required in order to stay quit for life. Making the decision to do so is not in itself sufficient to guarantee success.
My reading is that you disagree with this and have been maintaining that making a BP alone is required.
Is that an accurate description of what you have been saying and do you disagree with anything in what I've just said?
My intent is not to try and prove anyone wrong , but to highlight , show, recognize AV.
Guest
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 170
Separating and shifting can be useful.
But not required.
If some evil madman had a futuristic brain scanning machine that could detect when I was separating and shifting and threatened my life if I did so, I would still not drink.
But not required.
If some evil madman had a futuristic brain scanning machine that could detect when I was separating and shifting and threatened my life if I did so, I would still not drink.
quat
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: terra (mostly)firma
Posts: 4,823
"I will remain abstinent" implies the very realistic circumstance in the future WHEN the Beast will rear its ugly head and I will employ the AVRT techniques to dismiss it. (AVRT as a process).
"I don't drink" implies that I have made a BP and that any muttering from the Beast is meaningless. (AVRT as an event)
My assertion is that I am at the former "stage" now and I will move towards the latter statement as I practice AVRT further.
Whether it's neuroplasticity or not is irrelevant so I won't use that term again.
Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,654
I separated/dissociated from the Beast when I made my Big Plan. The BP then acted as an anti-virus program, instantly recognising and ignoring the Beast’s AV, when it arose.
Maybe I’m missing something. RR/AVRT seems straightforward to me. If I’m overlooking a key concept, process, or nuance, it matters not, because my understanding and practise of it, definitely works, awesomely well.
This is my understanding from my reading and interaction with Secular Connections and when I made my BP in September 2016. I stand to be corrected by a purist, of course, perhaps for the purpose of clarity and the benefit of Newcomers......... but personally, I can’t say I would’ve successfully learnt and applied RR/AVRT had I landed on SR this year....
Maybe I’m missing something. RR/AVRT seems straightforward to me. If I’m overlooking a key concept, process, or nuance, it matters not, because my understanding and practise of it, definitely works, awesomely well.
This is my understanding from my reading and interaction with Secular Connections and when I made my BP in September 2016. I stand to be corrected by a purist, of course, perhaps for the purpose of clarity and the benefit of Newcomers......... but personally, I can’t say I would’ve successfully learnt and applied RR/AVRT had I landed on SR this year....
quat
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: terra (mostly)firma
Posts: 4,823
Tatsy
So you would say that you ended your addiction by deciding to never put alcohol in your mouth ever again, and that you feel confident in your ability to keep that commitment to yourself, regardless of thoughts to the contrary that spring up internally or that you may encounter from others?
Sounds pretty straight forward to me.
So you would say that you ended your addiction by deciding to never put alcohol in your mouth ever again, and that you feel confident in your ability to keep that commitment to yourself, regardless of thoughts to the contrary that spring up internally or that you may encounter from others?
Sounds pretty straight forward to me.
quat
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: terra (mostly)firma
Posts: 4,823
My view.
"I will remain abstinent" implies the very realistic circumstance in the future WHEN the Beast will rear its ugly head and I will employ the AVRT techniques to dismiss it. (AVRT as a process).
"I don't drink" implies that I have made a BP and that any muttering from the Beast is meaningless. (AVRT as an event)
My assertion is that I am at the former "stage" now and I will move towards the latter statement as I practice AVRT further.
Whether it's neuroplasticity or not is irrelevant so I won't use that term again.
"I will remain abstinent" implies the very realistic circumstance in the future WHEN the Beast will rear its ugly head and I will employ the AVRT techniques to dismiss it. (AVRT as a process).
"I don't drink" implies that I have made a BP and that any muttering from the Beast is meaningless. (AVRT as an event)
My assertion is that I am at the former "stage" now and I will move towards the latter statement as I practice AVRT further.
Whether it's neuroplasticity or not is irrelevant so I won't use that term again.
Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,654
Tatsy
So you would say that you ended your addiction by deciding to never put alcohol in your mouth ever again, and that you feel confident in your ability to keep that commitment to yourself, regardless of thoughts to the contrary that spring up internally or that you may encounter from others?
Sounds pretty straight forward to me.
So you would say that you ended your addiction by deciding to never put alcohol in your mouth ever again, and that you feel confident in your ability to keep that commitment to yourself, regardless of thoughts to the contrary that spring up internally or that you may encounter from others?
Sounds pretty straight forward to me.
quat
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: terra (mostly)firma
Posts: 4,823
Currently Active Users Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)