Is the Freedom Model progressive or harmful?
The word moderately being suggested but not the definition of the word moderately is deceitful IMO. It's a play on words, technically why isn't "heavily usage" "whatever that means to you".
We all can agree what abstinence means, there is no way to play the word. There is no moderation once you'll brain stops the production of natural hormones & chemicals (gaba, dopamine, serotonin, etc) and replaces it with alcohol it's neurological psychological trainwreck and let's not forget the physical effects.
We all can agree what abstinence means, there is no way to play the word. There is no moderation once you'll brain stops the production of natural hormones & chemicals (gaba, dopamine, serotonin, etc) and replaces it with alcohol it's neurological psychological trainwreck and let's not forget the physical effects.
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Bellingham
Posts: 513
I drank a Heineken zero this evening and had a thought. I like this flavor, but I am also still seeking something in the flavor. It's joy, stimulation. There is a slight placebo effect. But I am also seeking the possibility of contact. If I incorporate Heineken Zero's, then maybe I'll be able to go and enjoy connecting with other people in bars. I realized, this is deceptive. Maybe what is going on is that I am misconstruing the pleasure of the drink with the pleasure of human interaction. The drink is only an agent of pleasure, that amplifies whatever is already there very subtly until personal agency of connection and conversation is falsely attributed to the chemical. Like maybe it's a form of laziness or ignorance. If most connection is coupled to booze from an early age, then I am ignorant of the energy and art of connection.
I think there is something to be said for social conditioning, how in our culture much of the joy we share comes coupled with a stimulant or relaxant, or whatever alcohol is. Doesn't the freedom method address this? The coupling of alcohol with the normal human interaction we are too inhibited to undertake sober. Or in some cases it may be that it has nothing to do with inhibitions: it is just coincidentally there as a pleasure drug that intercedes and becomes part of social conditioning. It slips in there as an intermediary.
But I also think there is hubris in the freedom method in that creates a false duality between itself and AA when really there are many shades and many details that go into addiction and cessation.
I think there is something to be said for social conditioning, how in our culture much of the joy we share comes coupled with a stimulant or relaxant, or whatever alcohol is. Doesn't the freedom method address this? The coupling of alcohol with the normal human interaction we are too inhibited to undertake sober. Or in some cases it may be that it has nothing to do with inhibitions: it is just coincidentally there as a pleasure drug that intercedes and becomes part of social conditioning. It slips in there as an intermediary.
But I also think there is hubris in the freedom method in that creates a false duality between itself and AA when really there are many shades and many details that go into addiction and cessation.
Currently Active Users Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)