Notices

Which is worse neg. driving or reckless driving?

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-06-2008, 03:03 PM
  # 1 (permalink)  
Sober 22 years and relapsed
Thread Starter
 
AnotherDrunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 33
Which is worse neg. driving or reckless driving?

I got a DUI I didn't deserve (not kidding, I got another one also that I know I did deserve).

The prosecutor has offered a reckless driving and I go to court tomorrow.

I wasn't drunk, but I had had many days without sleep and I had an appointment I HAD to keep, so without any sleep for days I drove to my appointment and some people that were behind me called the police.

I was at a mini-mart getting some iced-tea when the police came on the scene.

They took my BAC and there wasn't anything there but booked me anyway thinking I may have illegal drugs in my system

I had two scripts in my system, that I had prescriptions for.

I'm trying to figure out if I even deserve a reckless driving, since I have absolute proof that the couple that drove behind me exaggerated.

Any advice is helpful.
AnotherDrunk is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 03:15 PM
  # 2 (permalink)  
1000 Post Club
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,202
Wow that's beyond my field... justice is so blind... sorry about your scene, I'm sure some people will list advice here for you.
Paulos is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 04:24 PM
  # 3 (permalink)  
Member
 
Boater62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 34
Originally Posted by AnotherDrunk View Post
I got a DUI I didn't deserve (not kidding, I got another one also that I know I did deserve).

The prosecutor has offered a reckless driving and I go to court tomorrow.

I wasn't drunk, but I had had many days without sleep and I had an appointment I HAD to keep, so without any sleep for days I drove to my appointment and some people that were behind me called the police.

I was at a mini-mart getting some iced-tea when the police came on the scene.

They took my BAC and there wasn't anything there but booked me anyway thinking I may have illegal drugs in my system

I had two scripts in my system, that I had prescriptions for.

I'm trying to figure out if I even deserve a reckless driving, since I have absolute proof that the couple that drove behind me exaggerated.

Any advice is helpful.
Someone's opinion that you may have illegal drugs in your system is inadmissible in court, absent a blood test. If the police did field sobriety tests that showed you were impaired, these would be admissible. Do you have a lawyer? If so, I would follow his or her advice. Without scientific or field sobriety evidence, it comes down to the manner of your driving. Reckless driving in my state is driving in a manner that endangers life, limb or property. If the prosecutors are offering a plea to reckless, that usually means they don't have the evidence for DUI. However, if your driving was erratic, taking a plea might be a good deal if it doesn't involve a suspension of your license. In my area, if a judge believes that drugs were involved in a reckless case, he or she is likely to take your license for a few months.

The people who called the police have to show up in court and testify in order for you to be convicted. I've found that you never know what citizen witnesses will say, and many times they will exaggerate or flat out lie because they were angry at the time.

My instincts are usually if I have citizen witnesses, to plead not guilty see what happens. If the cop didn't come until later, he is not a witness to the incident at all and cannot testify regarding what the witnesses claim happened. Every now and then I get a "Barney Fife" witness who is just mad that someone cut in front of him, and calls the cops on his cell phone. Sometimes the judge will throw out the case, or convict on a lesser charge like improper driving or failure to yield.

Listen to your lawyer -- that's what you pay them for. If you don't have a lawyer for such a serious charge, get one.



Good luck - JR
Boater62 is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 04:30 PM
  # 4 (permalink)  
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 12,136
In my experience, you cannot be convicted based on witness account only - not for suspicion of impairment by drugs or alcohol. The field sobriety test proved negative and if they suspected you had drugs in your system, they should have arrested you, obtained a blood warrant, and drew blood to prove existence of illicit drugs.
In Canada, you can be done with careless driving or dangerous driving. The former is a provincial offence and subject to a fine, the latter is a criminal offence.
I'm surprised that you are being asked to appear in court on a formal charge based on the evidence you present.
Hopefully you will just face a fine. Be careful not to drive when you are so sleep-deprived next time. I've seen people killed because of this.
Rowan is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 04:47 PM
  # 5 (permalink)  
Member
 
Boater62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 34
Originally Posted by Rowan View Post
I Be careful not to drive when you are so sleep-deprived next time. I've seen people killed because of this.
That's a very wise point. Driving when you're sleep deprived can be as dangerous as driving while drunk. There was a man in my area who, after being awake for two days, fell asleep at the wheel and killed two teenagers in a car accident. He was convicted of the felony charge of vehicular manslaughter and sentenced to five years in jail. The guy knew he was dead tired and never should have gotten behind the wheel.
Boater62 is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 05:00 PM
  # 6 (permalink)  
Member
 
Pinkcuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Colorado Prairie
Posts: 1,417
I'm not a fan of our Legal System. Their purpose is to maintain a high conviction rate as opposed to establish the truth of the matter. Their job is to convict you, regardless.
In my dealings with them I have found that you can be offered a plea agreement all the way up to the day of the trial. That may include an all out dismissal of the charges. It's happened to me.
They will threaten and extort you in the hopes that you will roll over and see things their way. The less evidence they have, the more severe ther threats will be. Don't fall for it under any circumstances. Their job is to "Prove You Guilty". Do they have proof???? If not I would call their bluff. That's exactly what it is! A bluff.
I will admit that it takes a set of kahunas to stare them down when they threaten you with jail time. But the bottom line is they need to "Put up or Shut up". Most of the time, they just don't have it.
You can choose not to accept the deal tomorrow and that will buy you another couple months to decide. The offers will get better as it goes along because they don't want to go to trial any more than you do. Possibly even less.
This is just my input and that's what I would do if it was my life I was gambling with. Don't construde it as me giving advise.
Pinkcuda is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 05:38 PM
  # 7 (permalink)  
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Cumming, Ga
Posts: 665
Actually, you did deserve it. You said that you had two "scripts" in your system. If these were mood altering substances, then you were impaired. It doesn't matter whether you have a legal prescription for them or not. That only speaks to whether you possessed the drugs legally. If I'm prescribed codeine and I drive, technically, I'm DUI. I guess the question is do they have a blood test or urine test to back up the charge. If not then it may be a matter of you deserve the DUI, but you're not gonna be found guilty.
BP44 is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 06:32 PM
  # 8 (permalink)  
Philippines/Canada
 
StayinAlive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 454
Thats just what you need now eh. Not good timing with your recent DUI. I had a dangerous here in Canada which is the same as reckless i think. As Rowan mentioned its a criminal offense with one year suspension but have no idea what the penalties are in your area. You may be able to google it. Some lawyers will not charge for the first call or visit. What did you say in your statement to cop when he pulled you over. Did you admit tiredness and or meds. Hopefully not. A prosecuting lawyer will jump all over that. Remove all doubts and call a lawyer, take your time to research a recommended one. I wish i used a lawyer. Good luck.

Reckless Driving Lawyer / Attorney for racing or tickets in Washington (WA) State.

Last edited by StayinAlive; 03-06-2008 at 06:34 PM. Reason: added link
StayinAlive is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 08:47 PM
  # 9 (permalink)  
Sober 22 years and relapsed
Thread Starter
 
AnotherDrunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 33
Thank you!!

This case has drug on since Sept. of 06 and I'm sick of it but the prosecutor more than likely knows I'm sick of it. I've been going to court every month for 1 1/2 years only for there to be another continuance. This is the first time the prosecutor has offered me anything to my attorney's delight. I have the best attorney here for DUIs and he couldn't believe it has gone this far but as my trial gets closer and (I suppose discovery has happened) the prosecutor is seeing that his case is weak.

I did end up totaling that Jaguar a few months later (Deb of 06, the DUI I deserved),I slid on ice in December of 06 and ended up in the median, no injuries to anyone, including myself. The man that pronounced my car totaled (who was not a friend) has written a statement that, as the couple behind me stated, I could not have hit the curb 3 times because I had low profile tires and then chrome and the fact that curbs are higher than 1 1/2 inch (which is how high my tires are being low profile) there would have been scratches and there were none.

The other experience with police.

I used to think the police were fair people until I had a couple of experiences with them. One was in 99 and I was late for my Yoga class and had a respected business owner riding with me, we're respected business owners too. Long story but this fat guy in a van was driving the speed limit and I was running late so I passed him on the right and he got angry and started tail-gaiting me. I sped up to get away from this psycho, not knowing had anything to do with the police. He called them and I was told that I had tried to run from the police. After the police stopped me the fat guy drove up and stuck his tongue out at us;.

During court they dropped it to reckless driving (BUT I DIDN'T EVEN DESERVE THAT). Police lie I have found out through that experience and this DUI experience too.

I have been called 4 times now to jury duty and they have no clue how biased I am against the police, although a few minutes ago I left a message about police lying.


Returning to the original DUI story.

When I got taken in for that DUI I kept telling the policeman that my cuff on my right hand was too tight and he ignored me. I had never been arrested in my life and asked them to take pics of my bloody arm, which they did but those pic mysteriously disappeared. Funny though, how the policeman writes in his police report (for no reason) that he checked my cuffs after having blood drawn at the hospital that my cuffs were fine and there were no marks on my wrists.:puppet

Originally Posted by Boater62 View Post
Someone's opinion that you may have illegal drugs in your system is inadmissible in court, absent a blood test. If the police did field sobriety tests that showed you were impaired, these would be admissible. Do you have a lawyer? If so, I would follow his or her advice. Without scientific or field sobriety evidence, it comes down to the manner of your driving. Reckless driving in my state is driving in a manner that endangers life, limb or property. If the prosecutors are offering a plea to reckless, that usually means they don't have the evidence for DUI. However, if your driving was erratic, taking a plea might be a good deal if it doesn't involve a suspension of your license. In my area, if a judge believes that drugs were involved in a reckless case, he or she is likely to take your license for a few months.

The people who called the police have to show up in court and testify in order for you to be convicted. I've found that you never know what citizen witnesses will say, and many times they will exaggerate or flat out lie because they were angry at the time.

My instincts are usually if I have citizen witnesses, to plead not guilty see what happens. If the cop didn't come until later, he is not a witness to the incident at all and cannot testify regarding what the witnesses claim happened. Every now and then I get a "Barney Fife" witness who is just mad that someone cut in front of him, and calls the cops on his cell phone. Sometimes the judge will throw out the case, or convict on a lesser charge like improper driving or failure to yield.

Listen to your lawyer -- that's what you pay them for. If you don't have a lawyer for such a serious charge, get one.



Good luck - JR

Last edited by AnotherDrunk; 03-06-2008 at 09:03 PM.
AnotherDrunk is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 08:50 PM
  # 10 (permalink)  
Sober 22 years and relapsed
Thread Starter
 
AnotherDrunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 33
Originally Posted by Boater62 View Post
Someone's opinion that you may have illegal drugs in your system is inadmissible in court, absent a blood test. If the police did field sobriety tests that showed you were impaired, these would be admissible. Do you have a lawyer? If so, I would follow his or her advice. Without scientific or field sobriety evidence, it comes down to the manner of your driving. Reckless driving in my state is driving in a manner that endangers life, limb or property. If the prosecutors are offering a plea to reckless, that usually means they don't have the evidence for DUI. However, if your driving was erratic, taking a plea might be a good deal if it doesn't involve a suspension of your license. In my area, if a judge believes that drugs were involved in a reckless case, he or she is likely to take your license for a few months.

The people who called the police have to show up in court and testify in order for you to be convicted. I've found that you never know what citizen witnesses will say, and many times they will exaggerate or flat out lie because they were angry at the time.

My instincts are usually if I have citizen witnesses, to plead not guilty see what happens. If the cop didn't come until later, he is not a witness to the incident at all and cannot testify regarding what the witnesses claim happened. Every now and then I get a "Barney Fife" witness who is just mad that someone cut in front of him, and calls the cops on his cell phone. Sometimes the judge will throw out the case, or convict on a lesser charge like improper driving or failure to yield.

Listen to your lawyer -- that's what you pay them for. If you don't have a lawyer for such a serious charge, get one.



Good luck - JR
They're not saying I had illegal drugs in my system, they're saying I had legal drugs in my system and I deserve to be trouble for that. I had been on one of them for 15 year and concurrently the other for 5 years. Go figger.
AnotherDrunk is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 08:54 PM
  # 11 (permalink)  
Sober 22 years and relapsed
Thread Starter
 
AnotherDrunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 33
Originally Posted by BP44 View Post
Actually, you did deserve it. You said that you had two "scripts" in your system. If these were mood altering substances, then you were impaired. It doesn't matter whether you have a legal prescription for them or not. That only speaks to whether you possessed the drugs legally. If I'm prescribed codeine and I drive, technically, I'm DUI. I guess the question is do they have a blood test or urine test to back up the charge. If not then it may be a matter of you deserve the DUI, but you're not gonna be found guilty.
They were not mood-altering drugs.

When someone has been on these two drugs as long as I have, they build up a tolerance to them and I have never, ever (when stopped for speeding) been told I'm driving strangely, other then than speeding. This was bogus. But thanks for your input, I'll keep it in mind tomorrow.
AnotherDrunk is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 08:59 PM
  # 12 (permalink)  
Sober 22 years and relapsed
Thread Starter
 
AnotherDrunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 33
Originally Posted by Boater62 View Post
That's a very wise point. Driving when you're sleep deprived can be as dangerous as driving while drunk. There was a man in my area who, after being awake for two days, fell asleep at the wheel and killed two teenagers in a car accident. He was convicted of the felony charge of vehicular manslaughter and sentenced to five years in jail. The guy knew he was dead tired and never should have gotten behind the wheel.
In all of the years of having CHRONIC insomnia, I have never been in trouble for it and in fact my husband spoke to me that very morning and I sounded fine to him. I know driving while too sleepy is a no no but it had never happened to me before and it won't ever happen again but regardless of all of that those people behind me exaggerated what they say I did. They say I hit the curb 3 times and almost had a head-on. I remember the entire event, it's stuck in my head, and I did none of those things, though I must have done something to make them angry.
AnotherDrunk is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 09:06 PM
  # 13 (permalink)  
Sober 22 years and relapsed
Thread Starter
 
AnotherDrunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 33
Originally Posted by StayinAlive View Post
Thats just what you need now eh. Not good timing with your recent DUI. I had a dangerous here in Canada which is the same as reckless i think. As Rowan mentioned its a criminal offense with one year suspension but have no idea what the penalties are in your area. You may be able to google it. Some lawyers will not charge for the first call or visit. What did you say in your statement to cop when he pulled you over. Did you admit tiredness and or meds. Hopefully not. A prosecuting lawyer will jump all over that. Remove all doubts and call a lawyer, take your time to research a recommended one. I wish i used a lawyer. Good luck.

Reckless Driving Lawyer / Attorney for racing or tickets in Washington (WA) State.
Yes I was honest, always have been, always will be. But I had not been mirandized (sp) yet he put that information in the police report along with the infor after I had been mirandized.
AnotherDrunk is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 09:20 PM
  # 14 (permalink)  
Psalm 118:24
 
CAPTAINZING2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ILLINOIS
Posts: 15,203
supposed to be in full physical and mental capabilities when, driving

Be thankful, it's just reckless and not vehicular homicide they got you on!!
CAPTAINZING2000 is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 09:30 PM
  # 15 (permalink)  
Don't get undies in a bunch
 
best's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: South Shore MA
Posts: 7,120
Thank you Captain

My thoughts were... When on my motorcycle...
What difference would it make if someone was drunk or sleep deprived if they hit me?

As far as getting past the charge... A good lawyer should be able to do that for you.


Next time call a cab.

$40 is cheaper then $3,000 for a lawyer.
best is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 09:56 PM
  # 16 (permalink)  
Sober 22 years and relapsed
Thread Starter
 
AnotherDrunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 33
Originally Posted by best View Post
Thank you Captain

My thoughts were... When on my motorcycle...
What difference would it make if someone was drunk or sleep deprived if they hit me?

As far as getting past the charge... A good lawyer should be able to do that for you.


Next time call a cab.

$40 is cheaper then $3,000 for a lawyer.
Hadn't dealt with driving while too sleepy. My husband had spoke to me that morning and I seemed fine to him.

Don't be putting fault where ignorance was the issue.
AnotherDrunk is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 10:10 PM
  # 17 (permalink)  
Member
 
Signal30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,002
Not all police officers are bad. (Yes I'm sure some of you were wondering if I was going to "chime in" on this.) Police officers are like everyone else, there are good ones and there are bad ones. I've been a police officer for almost 10 years and I have worked with great officers, and I have worked for some that were perhaps picked last on the kickball team when they were kids. If you believe that you were treated unfairly, file a complaint on the officer, and fight it in court with your attorney.

Authority may be a good topic for an inventory down the road for you.



Tom
Signal30 is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 10:40 PM
  # 18 (permalink)  
Sober 22 years and relapsed
Thread Starter
 
AnotherDrunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 33
Originally Posted by CAPTAINZING2000 View Post
supposed to be in full physical and mental capabilities when, driving

Be thankful, it's just reckless and not vehicular homicide they got you on!!
I am happy that is was no vehicular homicide, believe me.

(sarcasm) I'm also glad I didn't carry a knife or gun or bat to beat people up with.

Give me a break. I'm telling you I didn't hit the curb nor almost have a head-on but if you're hell-bent on believe the worst of me, go for it.
AnotherDrunk is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 10:43 PM
  # 19 (permalink)  
Sober 22 years and relapsed
Thread Starter
 
AnotherDrunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 33
Originally Posted by Signal30 View Post
Not all police officers are bad. (Yes I'm sure some of you were wondering if I was going to "chime in" on this.) Police officers are like everyone else, there are good ones and there are bad ones. I've been a police officer for almost 10 years and I have worked with great officers, and I have worked for some that were perhaps picked last on the kickball team when they were kids. If you believe that you were treated unfairly, file a complaint on the officer, and fight it in court with your attorney.

Authority may be a good topic for an inventory down the road for you.



Tom
I'm sure you're right, no doubt, there's good an bad people everywhere.
I just happen to run across some people that claimed I tried to run, which did change my opinion of their honesty and now I'm dealing with a prosecutor (no police) that wants someone, other than the court system to pay for all of the court costs.

Oh but then there's the bloody wrist where the pics disappeared, so there again are some dishonest police.

My two experiences have not been good ones.
AnotherDrunk is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 12:16 AM
  # 20 (permalink)  
Philippines/Canada
 
StayinAlive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 454
Originally Posted by AnotherDrunk View Post
Yes I was honest, always have been, always will be. But I had not been mirandized (sp) yet he put that information in the police report along with the infor after I had been mirandized.
I wasn't implying that you be dishonest, thats great that you are an honest person. From my experience when i was at the pointy end of the stick with a police man, i volunteered to much information. Details that had nothing to do with my charge yet were twisted and used against me.

From your original post i assumed that this was a recent event and you had yet to seek a lawyer. Sounds like your taken care of. What does he say, which is worse? neg. driving or reckless driving.
StayinAlive is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off





All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:18 AM.