Not picking your post apart to show someone 'doing it wrong', just my observation of your AV.
My last few posts had AV, especially the one GT comprehensively picked apart. But it's all good: the AV has - in the last few weeks - permeated my thinking and concealed itself unbeknownst to me, and I'm glad you both pointed out the flaw. I've been using non-drinker-status-subject-to rescission: the subject-to rescission suggests future drinking.
I'd be lying if the idea of knocking back a pint of vodka from time to time wasn't appealing; that thought consumed my mind all weekend, but I didn't indulge. Earlier you brought up the calamity clause, but there's the situation when things are going well, the consequences of drinking are firmly in the rear view mirror, and drinking is not only palatable, but desirable. That's the psychological hurdle I'm trying to get past.