HCD, you are doing an amazing job advocating for your children's safety and hopefully other children in your area in similar circumstances. Where is the common sense?! I don't need to be a scientist to know even just being around meth is not good for children. I agree, if there is any level of uncertainty of a child's welfare, supervised visitations should be standard until the judge proves other wise.
Any chance on having a news outlet or another child advocacy program willing to foot the bill to have your children tested for meth and how much after each visit? I am not that familiar with hair follicle testing but from I understand it may be possible to have some sort of a "date stamp" for exposure.
GM