You lost me.
So if I made a BP and then broke it and then ask questions (or express concerns) about making a subsequent BP I am engaging the beast?
Is the solution then to make the subsequent BP without discussion or contemplation?
The AV is telling Jess that because she failed, she will fail again. That because she had a reversal then she obviously doesn't understand all of this and will ultimately always fail. None of that is true. Period. So that does not need to be discussed or contemplated because its a lie.
If one doesn't maintain separation, then who is actually doing the discussing and contemplating?