Originally Posted by
awuh1 
"Bashing"? ….. It's a viewpoint. Nobody is requiring anyone agree.
If the proponents of rational recovery were more secure in their beliefs they would not find it so necessary to attack AA at every turn. The fact that they do speaks volumes.
"Attacking" is also a viewpoint, awhuh1, but strictly speaking, if I were attacking, the tenor of my posts would be very different. That said, is it safe to assume that if you could get away with it, that you would probably shut down all criticism of AA? Or at the very least, that you object to any criticism? That speaks volumes in and of itself, does it not?