somehow, I thought the thread question was referring to open AA meetings, not closed AA meetings.
I fully appreciate that a closed AA meeting should be child free, but I believe that a sleeping infant, quite possibly, should be considered as an exception to the rule if no other open meetings are available nearby at that time.
open meetings are, well...open. "open" however doesn't mean a poorly supervised rambunctious child or group of children should be allowed to disrupt it for everyone else.
common sense.