Addiction v. Cancer
Schopenhauer was himself a man who used sex to an excess. He believed it was human nature to be guided by irrationality whether it would be addiction to something (substances, behaviour) or someone (codependency). For Schopenhauer he believed that to be able to minimize our addictions, we need to detach from that type of lifestyle and instead immerse ourselves with a different type of lifestyle. Eg. If you are addicted to sex, then practice complete abstinence. In doing so, you will live a happier existence.
Same goes for our codependency. We know that it is irrational to live with an addicted spouse who keeps hurting us. Therefore we must do what is rational which is detachment. In doing so, we free ourselves from the negative and destructive force. Therefore we become happier. But also after doing so, we would have a greater appreciation for the good side because we have already lived through hell.
We cannot gain insight if we don't take the time to allow for this eg. Educate ourselves, work a program (like Al-anon), spend time to get to know YoU etc.
I think we live in a society and time that immersing so much time and attention to yourself feels unnatural. We live in a time and place where the norm is to work 8-10 hour days, take care of the finances, mortgage, the kids and the dog. An imaginary check-list of things to do that needs to be fixed or crossed off our list of duties are constantly hanging over our heads like a dark cloud. We do have a lot of responsibilities that we feel helpless and out of control if we can't manage the people and things around us. Well sometimes we need to take a step back and spend time on ourselves. Monks are viewed to be wise. They spend most of their days not surrounded by the superficial aspects of this world. They spend a lot of time with their thoughts, with themselves and knowing who they are and thus the insights of what is important. Giving the preciousness of life to focus your attention and energy on others and not yourself is a waste of life. Of course getting to this state is easier said than done because we need to bypass our human emotions of guilt and fear that drives us to stay codependent.
Guest
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 379
For the responsible among us, this rings true. On the other hand, however, I observe many, many, many people deeply immersed in selfish pursuits who expect others to take care of them.
We must not mistake superficial selfishness with a deeper knowledge, respect and love for our true selves, our souls. What does our souls need to be happy? I gaurentee its not material things, power, money, immediate gratifications.
My sponsor told me many years ago that we live in a dysfunctional society. I didn't understand at the time but surely do now.
I believe we do live in a dysfunctional society. Getting in touch with our individual pure souls is so important to get a sense of grounded-ness and what is truly important aside from all the chaos surrounding us (capitalism, self-indulgences, societal expectations, etc).
Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 90
I believe we do live in a dysfunctional society. Getting in touch with our individual pure souls is so important to get a sense of grounded-ness and what is truly important aside from all the chaos surrounding us (capitalism, self-indulgences, societal expectations, etc).
A.) Can the love of my addicted loved one actually fulfill my spirit? Can anyone's love? B.) Or is it more important to know that I am doing no harm?
Unfortunately, at the moment, I can't have both A & B. Going along with my brother's behavior was a self-indulgence because I got to enjoy the idea of a perfect family, even if he was slowly dying.
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,254
Addiction should not be equated with cancer. That doesn't mean effort and support shouldn't be given to someone who really wants to change their ways. One tends to 'catch' a disease while an addict tends to 'manufacture' their addiction over time. Also a chemical does not tell someone how to act like a criminal. It might make crossing the line from law abiding to criminal easier but it does not place an addict on wrong side of the law, they do that themselves.
Again doesn't mean someone shouldn't support another who really wants to change their ways.
Again doesn't mean someone shouldn't support another who really wants to change their ways.
Guest
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 379
Addiction should not be equated with cancer. That doesn't mean effort and support shouldn't be given to someone who really wants to change their ways. One tends to 'catch' a disease while an addict tends to 'manufacture' their addiction over time. Also a chemical does not tell someone how to act like a criminal. It might make crossing the line from law abiding to criminal easier but it does not place an addict on wrong side of the law, they do that themselves.
Again doesn't mean someone shouldn't support another who really wants to change their ways.
Again doesn't mean someone shouldn't support another who really wants to change their ways.
Not sure why addiction is equated with criminality.... I was an addict for many years and the only "crime" I committed was drug possession.
Guest
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 379
Here is a really neat tutorial on the basics: https://www.cancertutor.com/what_causes_cancer/
Currently Active Users Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)