Is the Big Book a real reflection of AA?
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,095
A guy in my home group (since moved out of state) used to twist this into "stick with the losers." According to him, the losers were the ones who just couldn't seem to buck and stay sober on coffee and meetings. They were the ones that had to dig deep into the program, take the Steps as if their life depended on it, and stay engaged in spiritual actions. Those 'winners' seemed to just will themselves sober and live happily ever after. :-)
Guess we are all works in progress when it comes to judging others.
However, I am not looking forward to it. When I have ceased discerning differences in people, places and things, I fear that my conversations and advice will be completely useless to mere mortals. For now, at least, I intend to use what communications skills that I currently have to convey my message
"Sometimes we become so damn spiritual that we are of no earthly use to anybody."
(Hank Johnson)
I apologize if this discussion has already taken place. I've searched and not found it on here or on Google. I also apologize if there's a more appropriate forum for this, but this particular corner of the forum seems to be where everyone hangs out.
Anyway but so I read the Big Book and the 12 book and ... They remind me of letters I get sometimes from a man who is only very mildly schizoid. Or else they remind me of, like, Victorian-era treatises I had to read in college.
Not relatable. Not something I can fit in my brain.
But to hear people who are IN AA tell it, I hear something else entirely. And then I listened to this wonderful speech Hawks linked to on my other thread (Clancy I?), and that, too, is so much more relatable and real to me than those books.
I'm the kind who always thinks you ought to do your homework (I won't say I'm the kind who actually *does* it, but in this case I am XD), so I thought if I don't like the books I won't like the program. True or false or something in between?
Anyway but so I read the Big Book and the 12 book and ... They remind me of letters I get sometimes from a man who is only very mildly schizoid. Or else they remind me of, like, Victorian-era treatises I had to read in college.
Not relatable. Not something I can fit in my brain.
But to hear people who are IN AA tell it, I hear something else entirely. And then I listened to this wonderful speech Hawks linked to on my other thread (Clancy I?), and that, too, is so much more relatable and real to me than those books.
I'm the kind who always thinks you ought to do your homework (I won't say I'm the kind who actually *does* it, but in this case I am XD), so I thought if I don't like the books I won't like the program. True or false or something in between?
Dr. Robert Sapolsky's lecture about Biological Underpinnings of Religiosity - YouTube
I have not read all of the comments on this thread.
Just want to say that every time I see the title pop up .... "Is the Big Book a real reflection of AA?" ...... I just think "Am I a real reflection of AA? Am I attempting to live the principles in all my affairs?"
Just want to say that every time I see the title pop up .... "Is the Big Book a real reflection of AA?" ...... I just think "Am I a real reflection of AA? Am I attempting to live the principles in all my affairs?"
Currently Active Users Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)