Originally Posted by
fini 
actually, dwtbd, i asked some questions. what you infer is is yours to deal with.
i asked the questions because drinking is often referred to here as this deep pleasure, and this deep pleasure and never having it again is something folks think of in regards to the BP.
therefore it is confusing and useless to draw an analogy to something else that it seems highly unlikely has ever been deeply pleasurable.
i'm not here to debate about my questions.
i wanted clarification about the OP's thinking and how they see this analogy.
because if there are circumstances under which you would indeed eat a raw chicken, then how might that transfer in your mind to drinking, when the analogy won't hold?
It seems I correctly inferred your implication that you are questioning the validity of a BP in the face of past deep pleasure.
Or or or , I'm incorrect and you were pointing out what Algo said visa vis the scarecrow tactic and it's ultimate uselessness if one were to engage with the AV and try to argue and debate away the Beast and its intention of getting more booze.